Connect
MJA
MJA

Evidence-based healthcare 10 years on: is the National Institute of Clinical Studies the answer?

Louise V Hall
Med J Aust 2002; 176 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04301.x
Published online: 21 January 2002

To the Editor: The recent creation of the National Institute for Clinical Studies (NICS) is an exciting new opportunity for bridging the gap between evidence and practice.1

  • 1. Silagy C. Evidence-based healthcare 10 years on: is the National Institute of Clinical Studies the answer? [editorial] Med J Aust 2001; 175: 124-125. <eMJA full text>
  • 2. Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-1748.
  • 3. Leeder S, Rychetnik L. Ethics and evidence-based medicine. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 161-164.
  • 4. Headrick L, Neuhauser D. Quality health care. JAMA 1995; 273: 1718-1720.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.