Issues

Volume 173 Issue 4

21 August 2000

Editorials Psychotropic drugs and preschoolers Joseph M Rey, Garry Walter, Philip L Hazell (MJA 2000; 173: 172-173)Ischaemic heart disease: across the social and geographic divides Andrew M Tonkin, Jeanette Pope, John D Glover (MJA 2000; 173: 173-174)SIDS: facts and controversies Ed A Mitchell (MJA 2000; 173: 175-176)Falls in the elderly: what can be done? Jacqueline C T Close, Ed Glucksman (MJA 2000; 173: 176-177) Research Characteristics and outcomes of older patients presenting to the emergency department after a fall: a retrospective analysis Anthony J Bell, Janet K Talbot-Stern, Annemarie Hennessy (MJA 2000; 173: 179-182)Predictors of bone mass in healthy older men in the community Peter Smerdely, Marilyn Seller, Angela Smith, Peter Day, Terrence Diamond (MJA 2000; 173: 183-186)Prevalence of Huntington disease in New South Wales in 1996 Elizabeth A McCusker, Reynolds F Casse, Shanthi J Graham, David B Williams, Ross Lazarus (MJA 2000; 173: 187-190) Public health Driveway motor vehicle injuries in children Andrew J A Holland, Rhea W Y Liang, Shailinder J Singh, David N Schell, Frank I Ross, Daniel T Cass (MJA 2000; 173: 192-195) Notable cases Wasp sting mortality in Australia Forbes McGain, James Harrison, Kenneth D Winkel (MJA 2000; 173: 198-200) Indigenous health Delay times and management of acute myocardial infarction in Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in the Northern Territory Michael A Ong, Tarun S Weeramanthri (MJA 2000; 173: 201-204) Clinical update Imagined ugliness: a symptom which can become a disorder David J Castle, Daniel Morkell (MJA 2000; 173: 205-207) Viewpoint The clinical role of quantitative ultrasound in assessing fracture risk and bone status George Phillipov, Max Holsman, Patrick J Phillips (MJA 2000; 173: 208-211) Lessons from practice Serious complications with neck manipulation and informed consent Roy G Beran, Andrew Schaefer, Toos Sachinwalla (MJA 2000; 173: 213-214)

Editorials

Mental health 21 August 2000 Free

Psychotropic drugs and preschoolers

Editorial Psychotropic drugs and preschoolers With little evidence for the safety and effectiveness of these drugs in the very young, doctors are in a difficult position MJA 2000; 173: 172-173 Disturbingly, recent overseas reports suggest that the prescribing of stimulant, antipsychotic, antidepressant and other psychotropic drugs for very young children is increasing.1,2 Of even greater concern is that a significant number of these children may be given more than one psychotropic drug concurrently.3While no systematic data are available to show whether the same phenomena are occurring in Australia, there are indications that prescribing of psychotropics for preschoolers is not uncommon in this country. A survey of 788 parents whose children were treated with stimulants found that 8% were aged under five years when diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder;4 presumably, many were given medication. Preliminary data provided by the Pharmaceutical Services Branch of the New South Wales Department of Health (NSW Health) show that in the past decade stimulant treatment was initiated (an authority was given) in NSW for 5819 children younger than six years: 67 (1%) were aged two and 715 (12%) three. There was a 12-fold increase in the number of preschool children treated with stimulants between 1990 and 1999. There are no Australian data about the use of other psychotropic drugs in this age group, but our clinical experience shows that antidepressants, antipsychotics and clonidine are being used. Reports suggesting an increase in the prescribing of clonidine in preschoolers, often concurrently with stimulants, are appearing. The result is a disturbing number of clonidine poisonings in very young children.5,6 ...medication, rightly or wrongly, has become more common in managing problematic behaviour, even in the very young. It is worrying that psychotropics are being prescribed for preschoolers. Firstly, with few exceptions, in most countries these medications are not approved for use in the very young. Secondly, there are very few controlled data showing whether they are effective in this age group.7 Thirdly, psychiatric diagnoses in preschoolers generally lack validity and reliability. This is because preschool-age children have a limited repertoire of emotions and behaviours and a reduced ability to communicate, which leads to a reliance on parental reports. Further complications are an overlap of symptoms with temperamental characteristics, difficulties in establishing the range of age-appropriate behaviours in the context of differences in maturation, and the fact that children of this age are highly reactive to environmental stressors, family conflict and inadequate parenting. Fourthly, there is little knowledge and considerable apprehension about the long-term effect of psychotropics on the developing brain. Fifthly, there are scarce data about the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these drugs in the very young. Finally, rather than placing the best interests of the child first, some practitioners may react to pressure from preschools, childcare services or parents. For all of these reasons, prescribing psychotropics in preschoolers is of concern. The problem is magnified if the child is reviewed infrequently, as seems the case for many of those taking stimulants.3 A review of 624 children hospitalised for any reason in five European countries showed that over two-thirds had received medications that were not licensed for use in children or "off label" (ie, used for indications or in patient groups other than those approved by the regulatory bodies).8 Thus, the prescribing of psychotropics to preschoolers is part of the world-wide pattern of prescribing drugs for children off label. This situation is the result of most drugs' not having been tested in children, let alone preschoolers. Drugs are studied in adults, and physicians assume they will be effective and safe for the young. However, such an assumption is unwarranted, as the experience with tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression in children has shown.9 That experience also shows that clinicians find it difficult to wait for the evidence and, in its absence, may prescribe medications that are not only ineffective but also potentially hazardous. With society and families undergoing rapid change, physicians are confronted with growing numbers of young children with severe behavioural problems, with many parents who have limited parenting skills and with an increasingly demanding public. This is compounded by overwhelmed and inadequate social and mental health services for young people. It is not surprising that medication, rightly or wrongly, has become more common in managing problematic behaviour, even in the very young. At the same time, there are preschool children who present with severe symptoms and impairment who do not respond to appropriate psychosocial treatments.7,10,11 Depriving them of potentially effective medication (eg, stimulants, for which there is ample evidence of effectiveness in older children) may be unwarranted. Clinicians find themselves in an all-too-familiar predicament: urged to prescribe but having no evidence base for doing so. None the less, sympathy with the physician's predicament does not justify potentially unsafe practices. Education in paediatric psychopharmacology -- made more necessary by the large number of new drugs marketed recently -- and increasing awareness of the range of effective, non-pharmacological interventions available7,10,11 are probably better alternatives for minimising unproven practices than greater control of prescribing. These problems are not new. Many were identified in a 1997 report which emphasised that labelling of medications for children was poor, that liability was transferred to prescribers, that lack of research could deprive children of access (including subsidised access) to effective treatments, and that ethical concerns made it difficult to conduct treatment trials in this age group, thus creating a vicious cycle.12 We wonder whether the recommendations in this report have been implemented with the diligence this matter deserves. For example, are all relevant new drugs which are submitted for registration required to include paediatric indications? (This requirement has already been implemented in the United States.) Have disincentives for research and for registration of medications for use in children been reviewed or removed? The NHMRC needs to make funding of research on the use of drugs in children a priority, and to tackle the difficult ethical issues involved. This is not something other stakeholders, like the pharmaceutical industry, are likely to take on. It is clear that clinicians are not the only ones responsible for the current state of affairs. Joseph M Rey Professor, Department of Psychological Medicine University of Sydney and Director of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Northern Sydney Health Garry Walter Clinical Lecturer, Department of Psychological Medicine University of Sydney and Acting Director Central Sydney Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Philip L Hazell Conjoint Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University of Newcastle and Director of Child and Youth Mental Health Services, Hunter Mental Health Zito JM, Safer DJ, dosReis S, et al. Trends in the prescribing of psychotropic medications to preschoolers. JAMA 2000; 283: 1025-1030. Minde K. The use of psychotropic medication in preschoolers: some recent developments. Can J Psychiatry 1998; 43: 571-575. Rappley MD, Mullan PB, Alvarez FJ, et al. Diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and use of psychotropic medication in very young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153: 1039-1045. Hazell P, McDowell MJ, Walton JM. Management of children prescribed psychostimulant medication for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the Hunter region of NSW. Med J Aust 1996; 165: 477-480. Erickson SJ, Duncan A. Clonidine poisoning -- an emerging problem: epidemiology, clinical features, management and preventative strategies. J Paediatr Child Health 1998; 34: 280-282. Kappagoda C, Schell DN, Hanson RM, Hutchins P. Clonidine overdose in childhood: implications of increased prescribing. J Paediatr Child Health 1998; 34: 508-512. Hazell P. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in preschool children. Adelaide: The Australian Early Intervention Network for Mental Health in Young People, 2000: 15-28. Conroy S, Choonara I, Impicciatore P, et al. Survey of unlicensed and off label drug use in paediatric wards in European countries. BMJ 2000; 320: 79-82. Hazell P, O'Connell D, Heathcote D, et al. Efficacy of tricyclic drugs in treating child and adolescent depression: a meta-analysis. BMJ 1995; 310: 897-901. Barkley RA, Shelton TL, Crosswait C, et al. Preliminary findings of an early intervention program with aggressive hyperactive children. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1996; 794: 277-289. Sanders MR, Gooley S, Nicholson J. Early intervention in conduct problems in children. Adelaide: The Australian Early Intervention Network for Mental Health in Young People, 2000: 43-50. Australian Drug Evaluation Committee. Report of the working party on the registration of drugs for use in children. Canberra: Australian Drug Evaluation Committee, October 1997. Make a comment

Joseph M Rey · Garry Walter · Phillip L Hazell

Child health 21 August 2000 Free

SIDS: facts and controversies

Editorial SIDS: facts and controversies We need to promote the established risk-reducing behaviours, which are based on strong scientific evidence MJA 2000; 173: 173-174 Over the period 1982-1986, Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show that there were an average of 457 deaths per year from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in Australia (1.89 deaths/1000 live births).1 Ten years later, over the period 1992-1996, SIDS mortality had plummeted to 210 deaths per year (0.81 deaths/1000 live births).1In spite of this dramatic decrease, SIDS still causes more deaths than traffic injuries, congenital anomalies and cancer combined in the 1-4 years age group.1 Here, I briefly discuss the established risk factors for SIDS and current areas of controversy. Sleeping position: Studies dating back to the 1960s, but mostly in the 1980s, had suggested that prone sleeping position was associated with SIDS, but it was not until SIDS prevention campaigns had been successfully run in the Netherlands and New Zealand that the potential for reducing SIDS mortality by modifying this risk factor was recognised.2 In 1991, Australia launched its "Reducing the Risk" campaign, driven by SIDS organisations and supported by Red Nose Day funds. In New Zealand, we observed a close temporal relationship between Red Nose Day education campaigns and reduction in the prevalence of placing infants in the prone sleeping position.3 This illustrates the powerful synergy that can be created when professional and voluntary/parent groups work together. The fall in SIDS mortality can be attributed almost entirely to a change in the prevalence of placing infants in the prone sleeping position,4 supporting the contention that prone sleeping is part of the causal pathway and is a cause of SIDS. Recent evidence suggests that sleeping on the side doubles the risk of SIDS compared with sleeping in a supine position, probably because of infants turning to the prone position ("secondary prone").5 Infants who usually sleep supine but are placed prone (ie, are unaccustomed to the prone position) are at very high risk of SIDS.6,7 Smoking: Maternal smoking is the other major non-controversial risk factor for SIDS.8 Since the reduction in the prevalence of prone sleeping position, there have been eight studies examining maternal smoking and SIDS. The pooled unadjusted (not adjusted for confounders) relative risk (RR) determined from these studies is 4.7, which suggests that infants of mothers who smoke are at an almost fivefold greater risk of SIDS than infants of mothers who do not smoke. Evidence for the effect of environmental tobacco smoke exposure can be obtained by examining the risk of SIDS from paternal smoking where the mother is a non-smoker. There have been six such studies. The pooled unadjusted RR for these studies was 1.4. The increased risk of SIDS with tobacco smoke is probably predominantly due to an in-utero effect of tobacco smoke rather than postnatal environmental tobacco smoke.8 Bedding and clothing: Excess bedding and clothing have been shown to increase the risk of SIDS in infants sleeping prone, but not for infants sleeping on their side or back. As few infants in Australia sleep prone,4advice on the amount of bedding and clothing could be dropped. Some 15%-20% of infants who die of SIDS are found with their head covered by bedding.9 Covering of the head might cause death by forcing an infant to rebreathe expired gases or by creating thermal stress. There have been several suggestions as to how to avoid covering of the head, including tucking bedding in firmly, removing bedding, placing infants at the foot of the cot, using the Dutch sleeping sack, and avoiding the use of duvets. The evidence to support these recommendations is limited. Bed sharing: It is well established that infants who share a bed with mothers who smoked during the pregnancy are at increased risk of SIDS.5 Whether or not there is an increased risk for infants sharing a bed with mothers who were non-smokers has not been firmly established. If there is an increased risk it is likely to be quite small (pooled unadjusted RR, 1.4). Complicating the picture is the fact that in some cultures bed sharing is an established practice. Furthermore, others have advocated bed sharing to improve breastfeeding rates.10 Breastfeeding: Most studies have shown that the incidence of SIDS is lower in breastfed infants. However, breastfeeding in most developed countries is associated with socioeconomic advantage, and, when adjustment is made for socioeconomic factors, the protective effect of breastfeeding is less apparent.11,12 Some have concluded there is no decreased risk from breastfeeding,12 whereas others have argued that breastfeeding has a protective effect.11 Use of pacifier: An unexpected finding of several studies has been that pacifiers are associated with a reduced risk of SIDS.13 However, this benefit needs to be balanced against possible detrimental effects of pacifiers, such as a reduction in breastfeeding and increased incidence of otitis media.14 Vaccinations: In the past there was concern that vaccinations might cause SIDS, as the peak age for SIDS is 2-4 months, which coincides with the age for vaccinations. However, studies have shown that vaccinations are not associated with an increased risk of SIDS -- indeed, some studies have shown a reduced risk of SIDS at the time of vaccinations.15 Despite this, the media from time to time revive this old chestnut. "Toxic gas": The "toxic gas" theory has received considerable media attention in the United Kingdom and New Zealand, but has not been substantiated.16 According to this theory, toxic gases are produced by the fungus Scopulariopsis brevicaulis as it metabolises chemicals containing arsenic, antimony and phosphorus in cot mattresses. Proponents of the theory recommend wrapping cot mattresses in polythene, but this is potentially dangerous advice in view of the evidence that plastic sheeting in a baby's sleeping environment can cause death through suffocation.17 Despite the success of the "Reducing the Risk" campaign, SIDS mortality remains unacceptably high among Indigenous Australians (mortality rates for the period 1992-1996, aggregated for South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory, were 30 deaths per year among Indigenous Australians [5.29 deaths/1000 population] compared with 61 deaths/year among non-Indigenous Australians [0.81 deaths/1000 population]). The cause or causes of SIDS remain largely unknown, although the most likely mechanisms include airway obstruction, rebreathing of expired gases, thermal stress and an "arousal defect" (reduced ability to respond to hypoxia or hypercapnoea by arousing or waking up). There is now little support for the (central) apnoea hypothesis, which was the major mechanism postulated in the 1970s and 1980s. Physiologists need to show how the established risk factors might operate, and researchers need to explore the reasons for the high rate of SIDS in disadvantaged and Indigenous communities. We must also continue to promote the established risk-reducing behaviours, which are based on strong scientific evidence, and ensure that all new mothers receive this information. We need to devise and evaluate innovative methods for delivering these messages and changing behaviour among disadvantaged and Indigenous groups. New theories should be examined, and discredited ideas buried. The media have an important responsibility, as they are in a position either to create controversy and confusion about SIDS or to serve as a powerful force for producing change. Ed A Mitchell Associate Professor in Paediatrics Department of Paediatrics University of Auckland, New Zealand. e.mitchellATauckland.ac.nz Acknowledgement: I am grateful to the Australian Bureau of Statistics for supplying mortality data. Australian Bureau of Statistics website <http://www.abs.gov.au> Engelberts AC, de Jonge GA. Choice of sleeping position for infants: possible association with cot death. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 462-467. Mitchell EA, Tonkin S. Publicity and infants' sleeping position. BMJ 1993; 306: 858. Dwyer T, Ponsonby AL, Blizzard CL, et al. The contribution of changes in the prevalence of prone sleeping position to the decline in SIDS in Tasmania. JAMA 1995; 273: 783-789. Scragg RKR, Mitchell EA. Side sleeping position and bed sharing in the sudden infant death syndrome. Ann Med 1998; 30: 345-349. L'Hoir MP, Engelberts AC, van Well GT, et al. Risk and preventive factors for cot death in The Netherlands, a low-incidence country. Eur J Pediatr 1998; 157: 681-688. Mitchell EA, Thach BT, Thompson JMD, Williams S. Changing infants' sleep position increases risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153: 1136-1141. Mitchell EA, Milerad J. Smoking and sudden infant death syndrome. In: International consultation on environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and child health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999: 105-129. Beal SM, Byard RW. Accidental death or sudden infant death syndrome? J Paediatr Child Health 1994; 30: 144-150. McKenna JJ, Mosko SS, Richard CA. Bedsharing promotes breastfeeding. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 214-219. Ford RP, Taylor BJ, Mitchell EA, et al. Breastfeeding and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22: 885-890. Fleming PJ, Blair PS, Bacon C, et al. Environment of infants during sleep and risk of the sudden infant death syndrome: results of 1993-5 case-control study for confidential inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths Regional Coordinators and Researchers. BMJ 1996; 313: 191-195. Fleming PJ, Blair PS, Pollard K, et al. Pacifier use and sudden infant death syndrome: results from the CEDI/SUDI case control study. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81: 112-116. Hunt L, Fleming P, Golding J. Does the supine sleeping position have any adverse effects on the child? I. Health in the first six months. The ALSPAC Study Team. Pediatrics 1997; 100: E11. Hoffman HJ, Hunter JC, Damus K, et al. Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immunization and sudden infant death: results of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Epidemiological Study of sudden infant death risk factors. Pediatrics 1987; 79: 598-611. Expert Group to Investigate Cot Death Theories: toxic gas hypothesis. Chairman, Lady Limerick. Final report. London: Department of Health. May 1998. Kraus JF. Effectiveness of measures to prevent unintentional deaths of infants and children from suffocation and strangulation. Public Health Rep 1985; 100: 231-240. Make a comment

Ed A Mitchell

Ageing 21 August 2000 Free

Falls in the elderly: what can be done?

Editorial Falls in the elderly: what can be done? We need to streamline referral to falls programs and coordinate services within and outside hospitals MJA 2000; 173: 176-177 Falls are often referred to as one of the "geriatric giants", generating diagnostic and rehabilitative dilemmas for a variety of specialists in a range of settings. In older people, falls are associated with significant mortality and morbidity and frequently lead to a decline in physical and/or psychological function, ultimately encroaching on independence and autonomy. In addition to the costs to the individual and immediate carers, falls consume significant resources in terms of hospital admissions, bed utilisation, and use of other health and allied services. With an ageing population, the problems associated with falls and injury will escalate unless there is a coordinated and effective approach to prevention and intervention. Given that most falls result from a dynamic interaction between intrinsic and extrinsic factors, a multidisciplinary approach to their management -- incorporating medical, functional, and environmental assessment -- is likely to be most rewarding. To date, there is limited evidence to support a population-based preventive strategy -- it thus becomes imperative to focus on high-risk groups with the potential to benefit. For any falls prevention strategy to be effective and of direct clinical relevance, it should: be acceptable and applicable to the affected population (applicability); alter outcome in terms of falls and fall-related injury (efficacy); be cost effective (cost-effectiveness); and be readily applicable to everyday practice (practicability). There is increasing evidence to support intervention in specific populations, although caution is advised when extrapolating results from one setting and population to another. Tinetti and colleagues' seminal article showed the benefits of undertaking risk factor modification in older people in the community with specific risk factors for falls,1 while Campbell et al have shown a reduction in risk of falling after individually tailored home exercise programs for women 80 years or older.2 T'ai chi undertaken in a group setting has also been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent falls.3 More recently, Campbell and colleagues reported a significant reduction in falls after withdrawal of psychotropic medication in older people.4 However, within a month of completion of the study, 47% of their patients had recommenced psychotropic medication, highlighting the need to provide continuing support. The role of the occupational therapist and home environment modification has not been established. A recently published study by Cumming et al showed a reduction in falls in patients having a home environment assessment by an occupational therapist on discharge from hospital.5 Interestingly, the observed reduction was for both indoor and outdoor falls, raising questions as to the mechanism of the observed effect. Perhaps modifying the home environment enhances safety awareness generally. It should be remembered that most people who fall do not sustain any injury and do not present to any medical service,6 despite increasing evidence supporting targeted intervention. Older people presenting to emergency departments are an easily identifiable, high-risk population. Studies have reported that, among older people discharged from emergency departments, up to half show an increase in dependency, usually secondary to trauma.7,8 A two-year follow-up of patients for whom a geriatric consultation was requested in the emergency department showed 34% had died and 52% were in a long term care facility.9 Falls contribute significantly to the emergency department workload, as highlighted by Bell and colleagues in this issue of the Journal.10 They report data on older people presenting after a fall to an inner-city teaching hospital in Sydney. Their results emphasise the multifactorial nature of falls. A UK inner-city teaching hospital with comparable baseline demographics has produced evidence of the benefits of a structured interdisciplinary assessment of such patients.11 The high rate of injury and admission reported by Bell et al is not surprising and reflects our own experience -- elderly people are four to five times more likely to be admitted to hospital than younger people -- and this must be taken into consideration in the context of demographic projections for the next 25-30 years. The emergency department represents a key interface between the hospital and the community and, as such, affords a unique opportunity for interdisciplinary and multiprofessional cooperation across health and social care sectors. However, assessment in the emergency department focuses largely on injury and limited time is available for investigating underlying causes or implementing preventive strategies. It is neither practical nor feasible for all older people who fall to undergo a detailed assessment in the emergency department, or to be assessed by geriatricians. However, using derived and easily identifiable predictors of risk, it is possible to streamline referrals to a falls program or clinic, which would be in keeping with an attainable level of service commitment. Predictors of future risk, as identified in the emergency department, include a history of one or more falls in the previous year, a fall occurring indoors, inability to get up from the floor after a fall, and polypharmacy (four or more regularly prescribed medications).12 Only through effective liaison with services within and outside hospital can we improve the outcome for older people presenting with falls. The increasing provision of falls programs fulfilling the effective intervention criteria provides the ideal opportunity to bring together existing, but frequently fragmented, services to enhance the care of older people. Jacqueline C T Close Physician Clinical Age Research Unit Department of Health Care of the Elderly King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry London, UK jacqueline.closeATkcl.ac.uk Ed Glucksman Physician, Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine King's College Hospital, London, UK Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G, et al. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 821-827. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a general practice programme of home based exercise to prevent falls in elderly women. BMJ 1997; 315: 1065-1069. Wolf SL, Barnhart HX, Kutner NG, et al. Reducing frailty and falls in older persons: an investigation of Tai Chi and computerized balance training. Atlanta FICSIT Group. Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 489-497. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, et al. Psychotropic medication withdrawal and a home-based exercise program to prevent falls: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 850-853. Cumming RG, Thomas M, Szonyi G, et al. Home visits by an occupational therapist for assessment and modification of environmental hazards: a randomized trial of falls prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 1397-1402. Graham HJ, Firth J. Home accidents in older people: role of primary health care team. BMJ 1992; 305: 30-32. Gerson LW, Rousseau EW, Hogan TM, et al. Multicenter study of case finding in elderly emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 1995; 2: 729-734. Khan SA, Miskelly FG, Platt JS, Bhattachryya BK. Missed diagnoses among elderly patients discharged from an accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med 1996; 13: 256-257. Sinoff G, Clarfield AM, Bergman H, Beaudet M. A two-year follow-up of geriatric consults in the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 716-720. Bell AJ, Talbot-Stern JK, Hennessy A. Characteristics and outcomes of older patients presenting to the emergency department after a fall: a retrospective analysis. Med J Aust 2000; 173: 179-182. Close JCT, Ellis M, Hooper R, et al. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 93-97. Close JCT, Ellis M, Hooper R, et al. Predictors of falls -- results from Prevention of Falls in the Elderly Trial (PROFET). Age Ageing 1999, 28 Suppl 1: 14. Make a comment

Ed Glucksman

Research

Emergency medicine 21 August 2000 Free

Characteristics and outcomes of older patients presenting to the emergency department after a fall: a retrospective analysis

Research Characteristics and outcomes of older patients presenting to the emergency department after a fall: a retrospective analysis Anthony J Bell, Janet K Talbot-Stern and Annemarie Hennessy MJA 2000; 173: 179-182 For editorial comment, see Close & Glucksman Abstract - Methods - Results - Discussion - References - Authors' details - - More articles on Emergency medicine Abstract Objectives: To study older patients presenting to the emergency department after a fall -- factors associated with the fall, injuries sustained and outcome. Design: A retrospective analysis using the Emergency Department Information System (EDIS), the Trauma Registry and the patient information database (CCIS), in addition to the patient's emergency and inpatient medical records. Setting: Emergency department of a major inner city teaching hospital, 1 June - 30 November 1997. Patients: All patients over 65 years presenting to the emergency department (ED) after a fall, for whom complete medical records were available. Results: Of 803 patients over 65 years presenting to the ED after a fall, complete records were available for 733 (91.3%) (283 men and 450 women). Extrinsic (accidental) causes were implicated in more than a third of falls (313 patients [42.7%]). A high proportion of the patients were living at home (520; 70.9%) and walking unaided (389; 53.1%). Although absolute numbers of women increased with age, men were as likely as women to present after a fall. Many patients had fallen before -- 39% of the men (111/283) and 24% of the women (110/450). In 78 patients (10.6%), alcohol misuse may have been a direct cause of the fall. The overall injury rate was 70.5% (517/733 patients), the most common injury being an isolated fracture (269/517 patients; 52.0%). In all, 419 patients (57.2%) were admitted to hospital, 48% (200/419) with a fracture and 52% (219/419) for investigation of the medical cause of the fall. The median length of hospital stay was 6 days (mean, 10.4 days; range, 1-129 days); 35% (146/419) of patients were in hospital for more than 10 days. Conclusion: Older patients presenting to the ED after a fall had high injury rates, high admission rates and often prolonged hospitalisation. About a third had fallen before. Patients at risk can be identified in the ED and referred to falls prevention programs. Census data for 1996 show that 12.1% of Australians are aged 65 years or over.1 This proportion is expected to double in the next 40 years,2 with major implications for healthcare costs. Alone, the cost of falls in patients over 70 years in Australia was estimated to be $398 million in 1989.3In the United States, trauma causes a considerable proportion of presentations (and subsequent hospital admissions) of older patients. Falls account for most of these presentations.4 The annual incidence of all falls increases from 25% at age 70 years to 35% after the age of 75; the risk increases with age and is higher among those living in long-stay institutions.5 Up to 10%-15% of falls result in serious injury, of which at least half are fractures. Even falls not resulting in injury may have serious psychological consequences.5,6 The "postfall anxiety syndrome"7 and fear of falling leads to decreased activity,8 and ultimately an increased risk of future falls.9 Patients have reported continued disability two months after a fall.10 No Australian report has been published specifically about patients in this age group presenting to the emergency department (ED) after falls, although previous studies have looked at older people presenting to the ED.11,12 Our aim was therefore to focus on patients over 65 years who presented to our ED as a result of a fall. Several features were of interest: why the patients fell; what, if any, injuries were sustained; what proportion of patients required admission to hospital; and what morbidity and mortality resulted from the fall. Methods Royal Prince Alfred Hospital is a 700-bed tertiary referral centre with 60 000 admissions and 45 000 ED attendances per year. A retrospective review of attendances for the six-month period June - November 1997 was undertaken. All older patients who had fallen were eligible for the study. Patient data Data were obtained from the sources below and thereafter patients remained anonymous. EDIS: Patients eligible for the study were identified by a search of the EDIS (Emergency Department Information System) for "falls" in the age group chosen. EDIS is a computerised database in the ED with demographic information, presenting complaint, diagnosis and disposition for each patient. Medical records: A predetermined dataset was recorded from the medical record for each patient presenting to the ED. This included medical record number, age, sex, type of residence (home, hostel or nursing home), prefall mobility, nature of fall, alcohol misuse, recurrent fall, referral status, triage category, injury score, specific area of the body injured, fracture, admission, specialty, length of stay, mortality, and discharge disposition. Prefall mobility was further defined as unaided versus aided (use of a stick, frame, crutches, assistance by another person) versus unknown. Trauma Registry: Additional data were obtained from the hospital's Trauma Registry. An Injury Severity Score (ISS) is calculated for patients requiring admission after trauma. ISS is the sum of the squares of the highest Abbreviated Injury Scores (an anatomical system classifying injuries by body region on a scale of 1 [minor] to 6 [serious]) for the three most seriously injured body regions. ISS ranges from 1 (minor injury) to 75 (severe injury).13 CCIS: For patients transferred to an affiliated geriatric and rehabilitation hospital, the patient information database (CCIS [Central Sydney Area Health Service Clinical Information System]) was accessed for the length of stay. None of the patients in our study were transferred to non-affiliated geriatric and rehabilitation hospitals. Population data: The Australian Bureau of Statistics supplied population data for the hospital's catchment area.14 Definitions Fall: "Inadvertently coming to rest on the ground or other lower level with or without loss of consciousness."15 Extrinsic (accidental) causes: Environmental factors (eg, rugs, steps, uneven floors). Falls as a result of external trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents and violence, were excluded. Intrinsic (non-accidental) causes: Syncope, dizziness or vertigo, postural drop, central nervous system lesion (haemorrhage or infarct), drop attack, and balance or gait disturbance. Alcohol misuse: A history of alcohol misuse related temporally to the event, a record of alcohol on the breath, or a statement in the ED record about the patient's being intoxicated. Statistical analysis We used Minitab Statistical Software16 for statistical analysis and performed χ2 tests. Analysis was based on age group or sex and compared with a number of variables: presentation as a result of a fall, nature of the fall, outcome of a fracture, and admission status. A multivariate analysis was performed on four aspects of the falls considered to be related to place of residence or mobility: extrinsic cause, recurrent falls, fracture/no fracture and admission. Odds ratios (95% CI) were calculated for each of these groups. Multivariate analysis was also used to calculate odds ratios (95% CI) for whether alcohol use contributed to selected outcomes: admission (yes/no), extrinsic or recurrent falls versus other falls, and age under or over 80 years. Results Patient characteristics Of a total of 22 782 patients presenting to the ED during the six-month study period, 4489 (19.7%) were patients older than 65 years and 803 (17.8%) of these patients presented as a direct consequence of a fall. Of these patients, 733 (91.3%) had medical records available for review at the time of analysis and complete for the purposes of the dataset. Age and sex: The average age was 78.6 years (range, 65-101 years) and the median age was 79 years: 263 patients were aged 65-74 years, 279 were 75-84 years and 191 were 85 years or older. Increasing age of the patients was associated with presenting to the ED as a result of a fall (χ2 test for trend, P < 0.001) (Box 1). There were 283 men and 450 women. However, the number of men and women presenting to the ED after a fall reflected the age and sex distribution within the catchment population (Box 2). Thus, men were as likely as women to present as a result of a fall. Residence: At the time of the fall, 83% (211/253) of the 65-74 year olds, 74% (200/269) of the 75-84 year olds and 57% (109/191) of those over 85 years were living in their own homes. Thus, the proportion of those living in either a hostel or a nursing home increased with advancing age. In 20 patients residence could not be classified. Previous falls: 39% of the men (111/283) and 24% of the women (110/450) had fallen before. Mobility: Patients were classified according to mobility: walking aided or unaided. As expected, as the patients aged the use of a walking aid increased. Cause of fall Extrinsic or intrinsic: Overall, extrinsic causes for the fall accounted for 42.7% of patients presenting to the ED. In the age group 65-74 years extrinsic causes accounted for 49.4% of falls, which is more than expected when compared with the proportion in the older age groups (39.0% and 38.7%, respectively). Intrinsic causes were more likely with advancing age (χ2 test; P = 0.018) and accounted for 50.5% (95% CI, 45%-57%), 60.9% (95% CI, 55%-67%) and 64.2% (95% CI, 54%-68%) of falls in the respective age groups. The breakdown of all causes for falls presenting to the ED is shown in Box 3. Despite extensive review of the medical records we were unable to classify 23% of falls as either extrinsic or intrinsic. Alcohol misuse: This was documented in 78 patients (10.6%): 18% of the 65-74 year olds, 10% of the 75-84 year olds, and was not a factor in those over 85 years (χ2 test; P = 0.001). Sixty-five (83%) of these patients were living in their own homes. Multivariate analysis for alcohol misuse at the time of fall showed it to be significantly associated with an increased risk of both accidental and recurrent falls (Box 4). Outcomes Injury: 517 (70.5%) patients sustained an injury as a result of the fall: 73.3% (379/517) had an ISS of 4 or less (a score of 9 correlated with a femoral fracture); 13 patients had scores between 15 and 25, with all of these patients (except one with spinal cord compression) sustaining intracranial injury. The most common injuries were fractures (36.7%), soft tissue injuries (16%), lacerations and skin tears (14.5%). Fracture: 269 patients (36.7%) sustained a fracture: 36% (98/269) of which were neck-of-femur fractures, 16% fractured wrists, 12% fractured humeral neck and 5% pelvic fractures. The breakdown of fractures in each group is shown in Box 5. Women sustained both neck-of-femur and all fractures more frequently than men (χ2 test; P < 0.001): 64% (63/98) of femoral-neck fractures and 73% (125/171) of all other fractures (95% CI, 66%-80%). Interestingly, in women, the proportion of fractured neck of femur to all fractures was 33.5% (63/188) (95% CI, 27%-40%), whereas in men it was 43% (35/81) (95% CI, 32%-54%). Fracture rate overall was not found to be related to advancing age in either sex. Admission: The total number of patients admitted to hospital was 419, or 57.2% of all older patients with falls (representing 38% of all older patients admitted during the study period). Sixty-three per cent of those 85 years or older were admitted, compared with 60% of the 75-84 year olds and 50% of the 65-74 year olds (χ2 test; P = 0.009). Of the 269 patients with fractures, 200 (74%) were admitted. There was no statistically significant difference in the fracture admission rate across the age groups (χ2 test; P = 0.53). Of the 200 patients admitted, in 49% the cause of the fracture was intrinsic. Patients admitted to hospital after a fall had a mean length of stay of 10.4 days (95% CI, 10.2-10.6) and a median stay of 6 days (range, 1-129 days). Hospitalisation for more than 10 days was necessary in 35% (146/419) of patients. Deaths: Thirty-two patients died in hospital, representing 4.4% of all patients presenting to the ED after a fall: half of those who died were over 85 years of age and half were from nursing homes. In those who died, the cause of the fall was intrinsic rather than extrinsic (27/32), and the most common injury was a fracture of the neck of the femur (10/32). Data analysis: Multivariate analysis of place of residence or mobility and extrinsic cause, recurrent falls, fracture/no fracture and admission showed no significant interaction. Discussion We found that older patients presenting to the ED after a fall had a high injury rate (71%), high admission rates (57%) and often prolonged hospitalisation (> 10 days in about a third of those admitted). Our study complements others performed in Australia and elsewhere on older patients who fall, particularly those who present to an ED.11,12Some studies have found that women in the community fall more frequently than men,17 and others, as we did, found no difference.18 Institutionalised patients have been reported to have higher fall rates than patients living at home,17,19 but most of our patients lived at home and walked unaided. Falls may be caused by an environmental hazard alone or a simple syncopal event, or there may be a complex interaction of environment, physical illness, and type of activity. Changes in vision, vestibular function and proprioception affect physical stability, and musculoskeletal changes affect gait. Postural hypotension from dehydration, drug effects or autonomic dysfunction may be involved. Additionally, acute illness such as respiratory tract infection, arrhythmias, carotid sinus hypersensitivity,20 cardiac failure and neurological problems (eg, Parkinson's disease) may increase the risk of falling. All these intrinsic factors may be compounded by environmental hazards.5,6,17 We found gait disturbance, syncope, central nervous system lesion, postural hypotension and dizziness to be the most common intrinsic causes, and these were statistically more likely to be the underlying reason for a fall as age increased. The proportion of patients with falls in association with alcohol misuse contrasts with the findings of Adams et al.21 They surveyed older patients over an eight-week period for alcohol use, and found a negative relationship between alcohol use and falls. A high proportion of our patients with alcohol misuse lived at home, with perhaps easy access to alcohol. These patients had a greater risk of extrinsic and recurrent falls, a potential relationship that warrants further study. A UK study found that most falls in the community do not result in serious injury.17 We found that patients presenting to the ED after a fall have a high rate of injuries, consistent with previous reports,17,22 but the rate was significantly higher than that found by Tinetti et al.23 We found women to be statistically more likely to suffer a fracture than men. Grisso et al,10 in an older inner-city population in the United States, found that women generally had higher rates of fall injury than men. In addition, they found that injury rates increased with advancing age, a finding that we could not confirm. There were fewer hip fractures in older men than older women in our study, confirming previous findings.24 This is probably related to the higher prevalence of osteoporosis in women. Previous reports have shown that older men with hip fracture have higher mortality rates than age-matched women.23 The high admission rate in our study, which increased in older patients, is only slightly higher than that found by Richardson,11 but this was in patients over 75 years, in whom a higher admission rate is expected. A UK study found admission was needed in only 34% of patients.22 Admission rates for patients with a fracture did not vary significantly across our three age groups, nor were they different according to place of residence or prefall mobility. Length of hospital stay similarly did not depend on place of residence or prefall mobility, differing from the Richardson study, in which a significant relationship was found between accommodation status and outcome at 90 days.11 US studies report that 75% of deaths after a fall occur in patients over 65 years.6 We found that the single most important factor associated with death was hip fracture, a finding similar to that in previous studies.7,11 Modification of the environment and dealing with intrinsic problems such as drug side effects and gait dysfunction can reduce falls,25-27 prevent hospitalisation26 and shorten length of stay.15 If 95% of problems can be identified from the history and physical examination alone, as suggested by Rubenstein et al,15 the emergency physician is well able to identify those patients at risk of further falls. Intrinsic causes can be treated and the patient's general practitioner or specific falls prevention programs can then proceed to modify the risk of recurrence. References Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australia in brief (Census data, 1996). Canberra: ABS, 1998. <www.abs.gov.au> Davis JA. Older Australia: a positive view of ageing. Sydney: Harcourt Brace, 1994. Smith RD, Widiatmoko D. The cost-effectiveness of home assessment and modification to reduce falls in the elderly. Aust N Z J Public Health 1998; 22: 436-440. Spaite DW, Criss EA, Valenzuela TD, et al. Geriatric injury: an analysis of prehospital demographics, mechanisms and patterns. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19: 1418-1421. Tinetti ME, Speechley M. Prevention of falls among the elderly. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 1055-1059. Nelson RC, Murlidhar AA. Falls in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1990; 8: 309-324. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Robbins AS. Falls in the nursing home. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 442-451. Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Kidd S, Black D. Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls: a prospective study. JAMA 1989; 261: 2663-2668. Gostynski M, Ajdacic-Gross V, Gutzwiler F, Michel JP. Epidemiological analysis of accidental falls by the elderly in Zurich and Geneva. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1999; 129: 270-275. Grisso JA, Schwarz DF, Wishner AR, et al. Injuries in an elderly inner city population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38: 1326-1331. Richardson DB. Elderly patients in the emergency department: a prospective study of characteristics and outcome. Med J Aust 1992; 157: 234-239. Stathers GM, Delpech V, Raftos JR. Factors influencing the presentation and care of elderly people in the Emergency Department. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 197-200. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W. The Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 1974; 14: 187. Needs Assessment and Health Outcomes Unit. A demographic profile of the Central Sydney Area Health Service from the 1996 Census. Sydney: Central Sydney Area Health Service, March 1998. Rubenstein LZ, Robbins AS, Josephson KR, Schulman BL. The value of assessing falls in an elderly population: a randomised clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1990, 113: 308-316. Minitab Statistical Software [computer program], version 12. State College, Pa: Minitab Inc, 1998. Blake AJ. Falls in the elderly. Br J Hosp Med 1992; 47: 268-272. Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF, et al. Circumstances and consequences of falls experienced by a community population 70 years and over in a prospective trial. Age Ageing 1990; 19: 136-141. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC. Falls [editorial]. N Engl J Med 1993; 331: 872-873. Ward CR, McIntosh S, Kenny RA. Carotid sinus hyersensitivity -- a modifiable risk factor for fractured neck of femur. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 127-133. Adams WL, Magruder-Habib K, Trued S, Broome HL. Alcohol abuse in elderly Emergency Department patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 1236-1240. Davies AJ, Kenny RA. Falls presenting to the Accident and Emergency Department: types of presentation and risk factor profile. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 362-366. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1701-1707. Diamond TH, Thornley SW, Sekel R, Smerdely P. Hip fracture in elderly men: prognostic factors and outcomes. Med J Aust 1997; 167: 412-414. Province MA, Hadley EC, Hornbrook MC, Lipsitz LA. The effects of exercise on falls in elderly patients: a preplanned meta-analysis of the FICSIT trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 1341-1347. Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, Glucksman E. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 93-97. Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G, Claus EB. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 821-827. (Received 10 Aug 1999, accepted 29 May 2000) Authors' details Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW. Anthony J Bell, MB BS, Emergency Medicine Registrar. Janet K Talbot-Stern, MD, FACEM, FACEP, Director, Emergency Department; and Clinical Senior Lecturer, Department of Surgery, University of Sydney. Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW. Annemarie Hennessy, MB BS, PhD, Senior Lecturer. Reprints will not be available from the authors. Correspondence: Dr A J Bell, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050. Make a comment 1: Patients presenting to the emergency department, by age group, June - November, 1997 65-74 years (n=2060) 75-84 years (n=1672) ≥85 years (n=757) Total (n=4489) Presentation after a fall Other presentations 295 (14.3%) 1765 317 (19.0%) 1355 191 (25.2%) 566 803 (17.9%) 3686 χ2 test for age trend (P<0.001). Back to text 2: Age and sex distribution of patients presenting to the emergency department after a fall compared with the catchment population 65-74 years 75-84 years ≥85 years Men Presentation after a fall Proportion of catchment population 124/263 (47%) 15415/32185 (47.9%) 107/279 (38%) 7251/18448 (39.3%) 52/191 (27%) 1650/6038 (27.3%) Women Presentation after a fall Proportion of catchment population 139/263 (53%) 15770/32185 (49.0%) 172/279 (62%) 11187/18448 (60.6%) 139/191 (73%) 4388/6038 (72.7%) Back to text Back to text 4: Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) of alcohol misuse and selected variables in older patients presenting to the emergency department after a fall Variable Alcohol misuse odds ratio (95% CI) Age at presentation 5.5 (2.8-10.6) Extrinsic cause of fall 1.72 (1.05-2.83) Recurrent falls 2.24 (1.35-3.72) Back to text 5: Fractures in older patients presenting to the emergency department after a fall, by age group (years) Fracture 65-74 (n=263) 74-85 (n=279) >85 (n=191) Total (n=733) Neck of femur 28 (11%) 37 (13%) 33 (17%) 98 (13.4%) Other 74 (28%) 59 (21%) 38 (20%) 171 (23.3%) No fracture 161 (61%) 183 (66%) 120 (63%) 464 (63.3%) Back to text

Anthony J Bell · Janet K Talbot-Stern · Annemarie Hennessy

Public health

Child health 21 August 2000 Free

Driveway motor vehicle injuries in children

Public Health Driveway motor vehicle injuries in children Andrew J A Holland, Rhea W Y Liang, Shailinder J Singh, David N Schell, Frank I Ross and Daniel T Cass MJA 2000; 173: 192-195 Abstract - Methods - Results - Discussion - Acknowledgements - References - Authors' details - - More articles on Paediatrics Abstract Objectives: To describe the frequency, nature and outcome of driveway injuries in children. Design: Retrospective case series of driveway-related injuries in children under 16 years of age admitted to the New Children's Hospital (NCH), New South Wales, from November 1995 to February 2000, and deaths reported to the New South Wales Paediatric Trauma Death (NPTD) Registry from January 1988 to December 1999. Main outcome measures: Circumstances of injury; type and number of injuries identified. Results: 42 children were admitted to our institution with driveway-related injuries over four years and four months. These represent 12% of all children admitted with pedestrian motor vehicle injuries. Fourteen deaths (including one of the children admitted to NCH) were reported to the NPTD Registry over 12 years, accounting for 8% of all paediatric pedestrian motor vehicle deaths reported to the registry. Typically, the injury involved a parent or relative reversing a motor vehicle in the home driveway over a toddler or preschool-age child in the late afternoon or early evening. Four-wheel-drive or light commercial vehicles were involved in 42% of all injuries, although they accounted for just 30.4% of registered vehicles in NSW. These vehicles were associated with a 2.5-times increased risk of fatality. In 13 of the 14 deaths, the cause was a severe head injury not amenable to medical intervention. Conclusions: Driveway injuries in children account for a significant proportion of paediatric pedestrian motor vehicle injuries and deaths in NSW. Prevention represents the only effective approach to reducing deaths from this cause. Trauma is the leading cause of death and disability in children after the first year of life.1 In children with major injuries (defined as an Injury Severity Score2 greater than 15), motor vehicle accidents have consistently been the most common cause of injury.3-6 Within this group, children as pedestrians frequently suffer the most severe injuries as a consequence of their small size in relation to motor vehicles.3,4,7 As paediatric pedestrian motor vehicle injuries predominantly involve young school-age children,8,9 conventional prevention campaigns have been directed toward these age groups.3,9,10A recognised clinical scenario in children is traumatic asphyxia with associated visceral injuries resulting from low-velocity compression of the torso.11,12 Typically, a motor vehicle reverses over a toddler or older pre-school child in a driveway or car park.7,13 In these cases, the pliability of a child's skeleton and soft tissues, together with the ability of the applied force to be distributed over the short time of the impact, often allows a good outcome.7,12,13 This clinical scenario has been variously termed the driveway, back over, crush, non-traffic or low-velocity motor vehicle injury in the United States, but has not been well described in Australia.4,6,13-18 We examined the experience of the New Children's Hospital, Westmead, (NCH) with driveway injuries, together with a review of cases reported to the New South Wales Paediatric Trauma Death (NPTD) Registry. Our objectives were to ascertain the extent of this problem, the nature of injuries, and the outcomes, in order to determine the optimal intervention strategy. Methods We performed a retrospective review of records of children younger than 16 years admitted to NCH or reported to the NPTD Registry with driveway injuries. Data were collected on the age of the child; the date, time and location of the injury; the vehicle type and driver of the vehicle; how the accident occurred, including documented safety features restricting access to the driveway; and the injuries identified, together with the surgical interventions, complications, and final outcome. The ethics committee of the NCH approved the study. Admissions to NCH: Data were collected from November 1995 (when the NCH opened) to February 2000. Patients were identified prospectively from the paediatric trauma database compiled by the trauma research nurse. In addition, a retrospective search was made of the case notes of all children admitted to NCH as a result of a pedestrian motor vehicle injury to ensure no cases had been missed. Patients were either admitted directly to NCH from its catchment area of Sydney's western suburbs or transferred via the New South Wales Newborn and Paediatric Emergency Transport Service from peripheral centres. NPTD Registry: The NPTD Registry records all deaths resulting from trauma of children under 16 years of age in NSW that are reported to the coroner. Data were available from inception of the database in January 1988 to December 1999. The police statement and coroner's report, together with the postmortem findings, were reviewed for children who had died following a driveway injury. Results Driveway injuries and deaths identified Box 1 summarises data on the 55 children injured or killed and the circumstances of the injuries, and Box 2 details an illustrative case. Admissions to NCH: There were 42 children admitted with injuries sustained as a result of a driveway motor vehicle injury, representing 12% of the 354 children admitted to NCH with pedestrian motor vehicle injuries. Thirteen patients had been transferred from another hospital. One of the children died. Twenty-six (63%) of the children who survived were under three years of age. Boys accounted for 74% of the children admitted. NPTD Registry: There were 14 deaths from driveway injuries, including one of the 42 children admitted to NCH, reported over the 12-year period. These deaths represented 8% of the 174 pedestrian motor vehicle deaths reported to the registry over the same interval. Children who died were generally younger than patients admitted to NCH. Boys were again over-represented (78%). Circumstances of the injuries and deaths Although 41 (82%) injuries occurred in the afternoon or evening (most between 4:00 pm and 7:00 pm), six (43%) of the fatalities occurred in the morning. There was no marked seasonal association, although 30% of the injuries took place in the summer months, when children would be more likely to be playing outside. A relative of the child or a family friend was the driver in 39 cases, including 12 of the 14 injuries leading to death. A four-wheel-drive (4WD) or light commercial vehicle (LCV) was involved in 34% of injuries in which the child survived, compared with 64% of those with a fatal outcome. Overall, these vehicles accounted for 42% of all injuries. They were associated with a 2.5-times greater risk of fatality compared with other motor vehicles. In 42 cases, the vehicle reversed over the child; 4WDs and LCVs accounted for 19 of these cases. Documentation of access limitation to the driveway was available in only three cases; in two this involved a front door only, and in one a fence gate, all of which had been left open. Nature of injuries Box 3 summarises the injuries identified. For 13 of the children who died, the cause of death was a severe, crushing head injury that involved at least one of the wheels of the vehicle passing directly over the child's head. All but one of the children with a severe head injury died either at the scene of the injury or in the emergency department of the receiving hospital. One child without a head injury died in transit as a result of hypovolaemic shock from a near-complete transection of the right lobe of the liver. In the children who survived, there was a lower incidence and severity of head and neck injuries and a greater incidence of limb trauma compared with children who died. In the surviving children, head injury was usually a consequence of a fall to the ground or cerebral oedema from traumatic asphyxia secondary to compression of the torso. Results of treatment Fourteen patients admitted to NCH required 18 procedures; most involved skin grafting or treatment of displaced fractures. One patient with cardiac tamponade secondary to myocardial injury had a non-therapeutic laparotomy at a country hospital for hypotensive shock that subsequently responded to pericardiocentesis. Final outcome was recorded as satisfactory or good for 34 of the 41 survivors, with a full return to normal activities and no significant physical or psychological sequelae. Active clinical and social problems were identified in seven patients (Box 4). Discussion Driveway injuries in children have usually been considered a minor public health problem,13 perhaps as a result of a combination of misclassification and the failure of non-fatal injuries to be reported to the police.7,8,14,16,19 The NSW Roads and Traffic Authority, which is responsible for compiling most motor vehicle injury statistics in NSW, does not collect data on driveway injuries because they occur on private land. Our figure of a frequency of more than 1 in 10 pedestrian motor vehicle accidents involving children that require admission seems representative of more recent data, although miscoding and under-reporting may have resulted in some cases being missed.6Of great concern was the number of fatalities associated with this injury mechanism: 8% of the total number of paediatric pedestrian motor vehicle deaths. Published figures range from 10.7% in New Zealand to 20% in the US, suggesting that our figure is representative.7,18 Male predominance is a feature of most traumatic injuries,4,8,13,14,16,19 and was particularly noticeable in our series, even below the age of five years. Our data suggest a marked difference between boys and girls in their exploratory behaviour that occurs from an early age.20 A family member or person known to the child was the driver in 86% of fatalities reported to the NPTD Registry; this high incidence is a feature of other series.7,14,17,18 Clearly, the psychological consequences must be devastating to the family, friends and neighbours.18 Our results suggested a link between fatal outcome, age of the child and the size and weight of the vehicle involved.14 Both 4WDs and LCVs accounted for a much higher number of the fatalities in our study than would be expected from their prevalence on the roads. They account for less than 30.4% of registered motor vehicles in NSW (Australian Bureau of Statistics, Motor Vehicle Census 1998, personal communication), but were involved in just under two-thirds of the deaths and were associated with a 2.5-times greater risk of fatality compared with other motor vehicles. Motoring and child safety organisations and health visitors should alert parents and relatives of young children to these findings to encourage greater awareness of the risks these vehicles pose to both toddlers and preschool children. Road safety organisations need to emphasise that the risk of injury appears to be particularly great when reversing in a driveway with this type of vehicle -- the increased ride height potentially reduces visibility and makes identification of a young child much more difficult, even with the use of convex mirrors or a wide-angle lens.15,16 In some prestige vehicles, a proximity-warning device, consisting of ultrasonic transceivers located in the bumpers, at an extra cost to the customer of between $900 and $1600, allows detection of objects within 50 cm to 70 cm of the bumper and above a height of 30 cm. Although the effectiveness of such devices has not been proven in this situation, their wider introduction in high-risk vehicles may help reduce the frequency of this injury.4,16 As nearly all the deaths involved massive head injuries not amenable to medical intervention, prevention represents the only effective approach to reducing fatalities.14-16,18 We suggest that an effective form of injury prevention is urgently required, particularly in view of evidence that this injury is often associated with shared driveways.21 The frequent subdivision of redeveloped residential blocks in urban areas might be expected to lead to an increase in these injuries.22 The optimal prevention would appear to be clear separation of the driveway and garage from the children's play area by a physical barrier such as a fence, wall or self-locking gate.16,21 There are risks to the inquisitive child not only from moving vehicles but also automatic garage doors and unattended vehicles.4,23 Although the construction of circular driveways might decrease the incidence of these injuries, such an approach would be impractical in most urban situations.4 The use of reversing alarms in passenger vehicles appears unlikely to be effective given that the group most at risk of injury, toddlers and preschool children, are too young to appreciate the significance of the alarm and act with appropriate speed.4,17 We recommend that the same degree of vigilance taken with regard to swimming pool safety should be applied to the driveway, and that legislation should be introduced to limit access to this area either by design or the use of temporary fencing.18,21 As an interim measure, we advocate extreme caution be exercised by parents, relatives and neighbours of young families when reversing out of driveways, particularly in vehicles with restricted rear view vision and at greater risk of causing fatal injury, such as four-wheel-drives, vans and trucks. Acknowledgements Mr A J A Holland is supported by a Surgeon Scientist Scholarship from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Dr J Peat provided assistance with statistical analysis. References Meyer AA. Death and disbility from injury: a global challenge. J Trauma Injury Infect Critical Care 1998; 44: 1-12. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB. The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974; 14: 187-196. Tanz RR, Christoffel KK. Pedestrian injury. The next motor vehicle injury challenge. Am J Dis Child 1985; 139: 1187-1190. Winn DG, Agran PF, Castillo DN. Pedestrian injuries to children younger than 5 years of age. Pediatrics 1991; 88: 776-782. Roberts I, Norton R, Hassall I. Child pedestrian injury 1978-1987. N Z J Med 1992; 105: 51-52. Agran P, Winn D, Anderson C. Differences in child pedestrian injury events by location. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 284-288. Roberts I, Kolbe A, White J. Non-traffic child pedestrian injuries. J Paediatr Child Health 1993; 29: 233-234. Lapidus G, Braddock M, Banco L, et al. Child pedestrian injury: a population-based collision and injury severity profile. J Trauma 1991; 31: 1110-1114. Dunne RG, Asher KN, Rivara FP. Behavioural and parental expectations of child pedestrians. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 486-490. Roberts I, Norton R, Dunn R, et al. Environmental factors and child pedestrian injuries. Aust J Pub Health 1994; 18: 43-46. Campbell-Hewson G, Egleston CV, Cope AR. Traumatic asphyxia in children. J Accid Emerg Med 1997; 14: 47-49. Sarihan H, Abes M, Akyazici R, et al. Traumatic asphyxia in children. J Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 38: 93-95. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Bower RJ. Low velocity vehicular injuries in children -- "run-over" accidents. Pediatrics 1980; 66: 628-631. Brison RJ, Wicklund K, Mueller BA. Fatal pedestrian injuries to young children: a different pattern of injury. Am J Public Health 1988; 78: 793-795. Olson LM, Sklar DP, Cobb L, et al. Analysis of childhood pedestrian deaths in New Mexico. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22: 512-516. Robinson P, Nolan T. Paediatric slow-speed non-traffic fatalities: Victoria, Australia, 1985-1995. Accid Anal Prev 1997; 29: 731-737. Wright MS. Nonambulatory "pedestrians": infants injured by motor vehicles in driveways. Clin Pediatr 1998; 37: 515-517. Partrick DA, Bensard DD, Moore EE, et al. Driveway crush injuries in young children: a highly lethal, devastating and potentially preventable event. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 1712-1715. Agran PF, Castillo DN, Winn DG. Limitations of data compiled from police reports on pediatric pedestrian and bicycle motor vehicle events. Accid Anal Prev 1990; 22: 361-370. Cass DT, Ross F, Lam LT. Childhood drowning in New South Wales 1990-1995: a population based study. Med J Aust 1996; 165: 610-612. Roberts I, Norton R, Jackson R. Driveway-related child pedestrian injuries: a case-control study. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 405-408. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Building approvals, New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory -- December 1999. Canberra: ABS, 2000. (Catalogue no. 8731.1.) Williams AF. Children killed in falls from motor vehicles. Pediatrics 1981; 68: 576-578. (Received 24 Mar, accepted 13 Jun, 2000) Authors' details New Children's Hospital, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, University of Sydney, NSW. Andrew J A Holland, BSc, FRCS, FRACS, Research Fellow and Clinical Lecturer, Department of Surgical Research; Frank I Ross, BAppSc(Nurs), MPH, Clinical Nurse Consultant, Department of Surgical Research; Daniel T Cass, PhD, FRACS, William Dunlop Professor of Paediatric Surgery; Rhea W Y Liang, MB, ChB, Surgical RMO, Department of Paediatric Surgery; Shailinder J Singh, FRCS (I), FRCS (Paed Surg), Clinical Fellow, Department of Paediatric Surgery; David N Schell, MB BS, FRACP, Consultant Paediatric Intensivist, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. Reprints: Mr Andrew J A Holland, Department of Surgical Research, The New Children's Hospital, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, PO Box 3515, Parramatta, NSW 2124. AndrewH3ATnch.edu.au Make a comment 1: Summary of children injured and the circumstances of injuries* Survivors (n=41) Deceased (n=14) Age Median Youngest Oldest 23 m 13 m 13 y 1 m 18 m 8 m 3 y 1 m Sex Boys Girls 31 10 11 3 Time of day Morning Afternoon 8 33 6 8 Driver Parent/relative Friend/neighbour Other/unknown 30 7 4 9 3 2 Type of vehicle Car 4WD LCV Unknown 26 8 6 1 4 6 3 1 Direction of travel Forwards Reversing Both directions Unknown 9 30 1 1 2 12 0 0 *There were no statistically significant differences between survivors and deceased. 4WD=four-wheel-drive. LCV=light commercial vehicle. Back to text 2: Illustrative case of a typical driveway motor vehicle injury Unknown to his parents, a 20-month-old boy was playing in the driveway at home. The back door was open and there was no fencing restricting access to the driveway. The father was reversing his four-wheel-drive vehicle out of the garage when he felt a bump. He stopped and discovered his son underneath the vehicle between the tyres. The father pulled the child from underneath the vehicle and then called an ambulance. On arrival at the referring hospital, the child was alert but distressed and uncooperative. Clinical examination revealed bilateral conjunctival haemorrhages and facial petechiae characteristic of traumatic asphyxia (Figure). There was an abrasion of the lower chest and anterior abdominal wall, with a tyre mark on the left shin. Radiological investigations, including a computed tomography scan of the head, chest and abdomen, revealed mild cerebral oedema, pulmonary contusions of both lower lobes, a subcapsular splenic haematoma and a minimally displaced fracture of the upper third of the left tibia. The boy was transferred to the New Children's Hospital, where his injuries were treated non-operatively. He required intubation for worsening gas exchange, but was able to be extubated within 72 hours. He was discharged home 12 days after the injury and was completely well three months later. Both parents required extensive counselling by a social worker. They no longer own the vehicle. Back to text 3: Driveway motor vehicle injuries identified in children New Children's Hospital* (n=41) NPTD Registry† (n=14) Head and neck injuries Soft tissue injury Concussion Skull fracture Facial fracture Cerebral oedema/contusion Cerebral laceration Intracranial haemorrhage Avulsion cerebellum Retinal haemorrhage Cervical spine injury 18 (44%) 6 (15%) 1 (2%) 3 (7%) 1 (2%) 0 0 0 1 (2%) 0 9 (64%) 0 11 (79%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 6 (43%) 6 (43%) 1 (7%) 0 1 (7%) Totals 30 injuries in 24 patients 40 injuries in 13 patients Torso injuries Soft tissue injury Rib fractures Pneumothorax Pulmonary contusion/laceration Cardiac tamponade Mediastinal/retroperitoneal haematoma Splenic injury Hepatic injury Renal and pancreatic injuries Thoracic spinal injury Pelvic fracture 19 (46%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 2 (5%) 1 (2%) 0 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 0 1 (2%) 6 (15%) 6 (43%) 3 (21%) 0 7 (50%) 0 2 (14%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 2 (14%) 0 2 (14%) Totals 33 injuries in 27 patients 28 injuries in 13 patients Limb injuries Soft tissue injury: upper limb Soft tissue injury: lower limb Upper limb fractures Lower limb fractures 3 (7%) 10 (24%) 6 (15%) 8 (20%) 0 0 1 (7%) 0 Totals 27 injuries in 25 patients 1 injury in 1 patient *Injuries in children admitted to the New Children's Hospital with non-fatal injuries from November 1995 to February 2000. †Injuries in children reported to the New South Wales Paediatric Trauma Death (NPTD) Registry from January 1988 to December 1999. Back to text 4: Adverse outcomes among survivors of driveway motor vehicle accidents Incomplete spinal cord injury with lower limb weakness and neurogenic bladder Retinal haemorrhage with visual impairment Unequal leg length and gait disturbance from lower limb fracture Epiphora secondary to nasolacrimal duct injury associated with facial fracture Residual left ptosis secondary to closed head injury Significant varus deformity from upper limb fracture Prolonged social work and psychological counselling of one family Back to text

Shailinder J Singh · David N Schell · Frank I Ross · Daniel T Cass

Notable cases

21 August 2000 Free

Wasp sting mortality in Australia

Notable Cases Wasp sting mortality in Australia Forbes McGain, James Harrison and Kenneth D Winkel Wasp sting fatalities have rarely been reported in Australia. We used data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and State coronial authorities to investigate deaths from wasp stings in Australia from 1979 through 1998. Seven cases were identified, all involving men in rural settings. Five of the seven victims had prior histories of wasp or bee venom allergy, or both, but none carried injectable adrenalin. All patients with a history of systemic Hymenoptera sting allergy should undergo assessment for immunotherapy and carry adrenalin. MJA 2000; 173: 198-200 Clinical records - Discussion - Acknowledgements - References - Authors' details - - More articles on Insects, bites and stings Australia has a diverse range of venomous creatures capable of causing lethal injuries. While most attention has been focused on deaths from snake and spider bite, arthropods such as jumper ants (Myrmecia pilosula),1 honey bees (Apis mellifera)2 and European wasps (Vespula germanica)3 can also inflict dangerous stings. Indeed, the widespread distribution of the hymenopterans (bees and wasps) means that their stings are a leading cause of mortality from bites and stings globally.4,5 The vast majority of deaths from Hymenoptera stings are caused by immediate hypersensitivity reactions to venom.4,5Despite the importance of fatalities from Hymenoptera stings internationally, little has been published on the circumstances and incidence of such deaths in Australia. For example, an analysis of Australian bee sting fatalities during 1960-1981 was unable to obtain adequate clinical information about most of the fatalities during that period, and coronial records were examined for only one of the 27 fatalities identified in that study.2 Despite the increasing abundance of the introduced and aggressive European wasp (V. germanica),6 and consequent concerns about the increasing health risks posed by this vespid,3 even less information is available about fatalities from wasp stings in Australia than for those from bee stings. Indeed, only two minimally documented reports of fatal wasp stings exist in the Australian medical literature. In 1913, Cleland noted "oedema of the larynx and subsequent death occurred from a man being stung by a wasp. He had been drinking out of the spout of a waterbag in which the wasp was hiding".7 Lee also made reference to a fatal wasp sting in a 47-year-old man in southern Queensland in 1957.8 Analysis of fatalities can provide important information on the determinants of severe morbidity, which may be useful in injury prevention. Thus, we investigated, in detail, wasp sting related fatalities that occurred in Australia over the past two decades. This period was coincident with the arrival and dispersal of V. germanica on the Australian mainland.6 In the absence of national coronial data for this period, we used State-based coronial information systems. In particular, we aimed to identify the contribution of allergy versus venom toxicity (envenomation), and the likely contribution of V. germanica to the mortality burden. Clinical records We identified seven wasp sting fatalities, which occurred between 1 January 1979 and 31 December 1998, from the following data sources: the Australian Bureau of Statistics mortality dataset; State and Territory Registrars of Births, Deaths and Marriages; State and Territory coronial authorities; and in one instance, from the family physician of the deceased. These data allowed us to analyse the circumstances of the wasp stings, the likely wasp species involved, and any history of Hymenoptera sting allergy and its management. This project was approved by the University of Melbourne Health Sciences human ethics subcommittee. The seven fatalities identified during the 20-year period correspond to a mean annual incidence rate of 0.02 deaths per million population per year. The deceased were all men living in northern New South Wales, or in Queensland (from the southeast to the far north coast). They were aged between 39 and 73 years (mean age, 54 years). Five of the seven deaths occurred during December and February, and the remaining two deaths occurred in April and May. In no year was there more than one death from wasp sting. All stings occurred in rural areas and four of the deceased were described as farmers in the coronial reports. The details of each case are summarised in Box 1. Discussion More than one thousand species of wasp have been recognised in Australia,9 but most are solitary, and rarely come into contact with humans. The most medically significant wasps belong to the family Vespidae.9 The genera Vespula, Polistes and Ropalidia, illustrated in Box 2, comprise the most important subfamily of vespids, the Vespinae. These social wasps cooperate in the construction and provisioning of their nests and have a propensity for interaction with humans. For example, European wasps are great scavengers and are usually found around areas of human habitation and activity, thus posing a particular hazard. In Europe4,10 and the United States,11 relative proportions of deaths from wasp and bee stings are different from those in Australia. In Sweden, these proportions are 90% for wasps and 10% for bees;4 corresponding figures for Denmark are 63% for wasps and 37% for bees,10 while, in the US, wasp and bee sting fatalities occur with approximately equal frequency.11 By contrast, our finding of a wasp sting fatality rate of 0.02 per million population per year is only a quarter of the reported Australian bee sting fatality rate of 0.086 per million population per year.2 This may reflect the relatively recent arrival in Australia of the European wasp6 compared with the European honey bee. Although our study was precipitated by concern about the health impact of European wasps, and we looked at a period that coincided with their arrival and spread on the mainland, we identified no fatalities attributable to this wasp. All of the wasp-sting deaths occurred outside the known range of V. germanica.6 This may change as increasing numbers of people become sensitised to its venom. Further research is required to ascertain whether the arrival of V. germanica has altered sting-related morbidity patterns in Australia. As in previous studies,2,4,10 in the deaths we examined we found that the reponsible wasp was rarely formally identified. Nonetheless, it seems likely that at least one case was attributable to a Polistes species. This is consistent with reports of severe allergic reactions to stings by Polistes and Ropalidia species in Queensland.12 Moreover, given the distribution of the various vespid wasps,9 it seems likely that all seven fatalities were caused by Polistes and Ropalidia species. This adds impetus to the call for purified Ropalidia venom to become available for immunotherapy,12 as, currently, only imported Polistes and Vespula venoms are available. The absence of wasp sting mortality outside Queensland and NSW contrasts with the nationwide occurrence of deaths from bee stings.2 It is possible that the wasp species found in Queensland and NSW possess greater allergenic potential than those found elsewhere in Australia. No systematic research has yet been undertaken on this question. The formal identification of the wasp species implicated in future fatalities would facilitate such research. Consistent with previous analyses of bee and wasp sting mortality internationally,2,4,5 we found a low number of stings, rapid onset of symptoms, no child fatalities and over-representation of middle-aged men among those who died. It has been proposed that pre-existing heart disease might explain the increased risk for men aged over 40 years;2,4 certainly, this may have contributed to death in two of our cases. However, our findings differ from these other reports in the high frequency of autopsy examinations and low rates of underlying cardiorespiratory disease. Venom toxicity is rarely reported in Hymenoptera-related fatalities,2,4,10,11 and we found no fatal massive envenomations. In all cases death was attributable to anaphylaxis (although ideally mast cell tryptase and IgE level measurements should be made to confirm this diagnosis). In contrast with previous international reports, most of the victims in our study had either previously diagnosed allergy to wasp stings or a clear history of systemic reactions indicating severe allergy. Thus, most of these deaths might have been prevented by specific immunotherapy, early treatment with adrenalin or both. However, patients and their families should be aware that vulnerability to venom-induced anaphylaxis persists at least until maintenance doses of immunotherapy are attained. As with Australian bee sting fatalities,2 most deaths occurred in the summer months when human-wasp interaction is most likely. The rural setting of these fatalities highlights concerns about the acute shortage of specialist allergists and clinical immunologists in rural areas,13 although it is unclear whether such shortages contributed to the fatal outcomes. Nevertheless, this underservicing, combined with the lack of Ropalidia,12Myrmecia1 and other venoms for immunotherapy, increases the importance of anaphylaxis emergency kits and education14 for those with life-threatening allergy to insect stings and their families. The fact that most of the deceased were reported to be farmers is consistent with the fact that rates of work-related deaths in agriculture are among the highest in Australia.15 Information on bites and stings should therefore be incorporated within injury prevention programs such as those developed by Farmsafe Australia.15 As noted in previous investigations of bee sting mortality,2 dependence on a single data set is likely to lead to an underestimation of the total injury burden. It is possible that additional wasp sting deaths occurred during the study period but were not recorded because of miscertification, misattribution as bee sting, or other inadequate or inaccurate recording. We found that the wasp sting diagnosis was almost wholly dependent on the presence of a witness and absence of retained bee sting on autopsy. Clearly, unwitnessed wasp sting deaths could be attributed to other causes, and our findings should be considered an underestimate of wasp sting mortality. Acknowledgements This study was supported by grants from the Victorian Department of Human Services, Snowy Nominees, the BHP Community Trust and Bayer Healthcare Australia. We acknowledge the assistance of Ms Malinda Steenkamp, Mr Stan Bordeaux, of the Research Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University; Mr Peter Burke and Mr David Jayne, of the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Brisbane, as well as the various state and regional coronial authorities, hospitals and individual clinicians involved. We also thank Assistant Professor Nadine Levick, of Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, and Associate Professor Gordon Smith, of the School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, for helpful advice. Dr Gabrielle Hawdon and Associate Professor James Tibballs, Australian Venom Research Unit, as well as Dr Jo Douglass, Department of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, The Alfred Hospital, critically reviewed the manuscript. Dr Ken Walker, of Museum Victoria, and Dr Justin Schmidt, of the Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA, provided photographs and entomological advice. References Clarke PS. The natural history of sensitivity to jack jumper ants (Hymenoptera formicidae Myrmecia pilosula) in Tasmania. Med J Aust 1986; 145: 564-566. Harvey P, Sperber S, Kette F, et al. Bee sting mortality in Australia. Med J Aust 1984; 140: 209-211. Levick NR, Winkel KD, Smith GS. European wasps: an emerging hazard in Australia. Med J Aust 1997; 167: 650-651. Johansson B, Eriksson A, Ornehult L. Human fatalities caused by bee and wasp stings in Sweden. Int J Legal Medicine 1991; 104: 99-103. Langley R, Morrow W. Deaths resulting from animal attacks in the United States. Wild Environ Med 1997; 8: 8-16. Spradbery JP, Maywald GF. The distribution of the European or German wasp in Australia, past, present and future. Aust J Zool 1992; 40: 495-510. Cleland JB. Insects and their relationship to disease in man in Australia. Trans 9th Aust Med Congress Sydney 1911; 1: 548-552. Lee DJ. Arthropod bites and stings and other injurious effects. Sydney: School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine. The University of Sydney, 1975. Naumann ID. Hymenoptera. Chapter 42. In: CSIRO. The insects of Australia. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1991: 916-1000. Mosbech H. Death caused by wasp and bee stings in Denmark 1960-1980. Allergy 1983; 38: 195-200. Barnard J. Studies of 400 Hymenoptera sting deaths in the United States. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1973; 52: 259-264. Solley G. Allergy to stinging and biting insects in Queensland. Med J Aust 1990; 153: 650-654. O'Hehir RE, Douglass JA. Stinging insect allergy. Med J Aust 1999; 171: 649-650. Douglass JA, O'Hehir RE. Peanut allergy. Education, avoidance and adrenaline are the mainstays of management. Med J Aust 1997; 166: 63-64. Fragar L. Agricultural health and safety in Australia. Aust J Rural Health 1996; 4: 200-206. (Received 6 Mar, accepted 21 Jun, 2000) Authors' details Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, VIC. Forbes McGain, MB BS, Honorary Fellow; Kenneth D Winkel, MB BS, FACTM, Director. Research Centre for Injury Studies, Mark Oliphant Building, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA. James Harrison, MB BS, MPH, Director. Reprints will not be available from the authors. Correspondence: Dr K D Winkel, AVRU, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010. k.winkelATpharmacology.unimelb.edu.au Make a comment 1: Summary of the circumstances and features of wasp sting fatalities in Australia from 1 January 1979 to 31 December 1998 Case Medical history Allergy treatment Circumstances Autopsy results Wasp identification 1 Previously well. No significant reactions to previous bee or wasp stings. Unknown Witnessed sting to the neck after disturbing a wasp nest while working outdoors. Collapsed with convulsions and died within minutes. Two puncture marks to the neck, severe laryngeal oedema, no coronary atherosclerosis. Identified by a professional entomologist as "paper wasps" (genus Polistes). 2 Previously well. Allergic to both bees and wasps (degree uncertain). Nil Witnessed sting to the scalp while outdoors, followed by rapid collapse, cyanosis and death. Single puncture to the occipital scalp, gross laryngeal oedema, no coronary atherosclerosis. Not formally identified. 3 Previously well. No known history of bee or wasp sting allergy. Unknown Single witnessed sting to the hand while gardening; initial marked local reaction only, followed by collapse, cyanosis and death within an hour. Erythematous left hand, glottic oedema and moderately severe coronary atherosclerosis. Not formally identified. 4 Previously well, but with a history of systemic reactions to wasp stings. Nil Single witnessed sting to the thigh after disturbing a wasp nest while working outdoors; dyspnoea, cyanosis, collapse and death within 30 minutes. Single puncture to the thigh, epiglottic oedema and no coronary atherosclerosis. Not formally identified. 5 Severe wasp sting allergy and a prosthetic mitral valve; otherwise well. Unspecified allergy treatment by family doctor and "specialist". Victim did not carry adrenalin. Single witnessed sting to the ear while gardening, followed by collapse, convulsions and death within minutes. Aryepiglottic oedema; moderate coronary atherosclerosis. Not formally identified. 6 Previous anaphylactic reaction to either a bee or wasp sting. Nil Single witnessed sting while gardening; developed urticaria, cyanosis and cardiac arrest within 15 minutes. No autopsy; death not reported to the coroner. Not formally identified. 7 Previous life threatening allergic reactions to "paper wasp" stings. Nil Multiple witnessed stings, while walking in a national park; collapsed with convulsions and died. Angioneurotic truncal oedema, laryngeal and tracheal oedema, no coronary atherosclerosis. Described as "paper wasps" by victim's son, who witnessed the stings. Back to text 2: Representative examples of the three most medically significant wasp genera found in Australia The European wasp (Vespula germanica). Photograph courtesy of Dr J Schmidt, Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA. Paper Wasp: Polistes humilis (left) and Ropalidia gregaria (right). Photographs courtesy of Dr K Walker, Department of Entomology, Museum Victoria. Back to text

Forbes McGain · James Harrison · Kenneth D Winkel

Next Issue Volume 173 Issue 5

View more
Editorials 4 September 2000 Free

Alcohol: the good, the bad and the ugly

Greg Whelan · Alan T Gijsbers

Research 4 September 2000 Free

Rates of in-hospital arrests, deaths and intensive care admissions: the effect of a medical emergency team

Peter J Bristow · Ken M Hillman · Tien Chey · Kathy Daffurn · Theresa C Jacques · Sandra L Norman · Gillian F Bishop

Previous Issue Volume 173 Issue 3

View more
Editorials 7 August 2000 Free

Alcohol and cardiovascular disease: still a research priority?

Timothy R Stockwell

Editorials 7 August 2000 Free

Women in rural general practice: conflict and compromise

Helen M Tolhurst · Jane M Talbot

Research 7 August 2000 Free

Moderate alcohol intake is associated with survival in the elderly: the Dubbo Study

Leon A Simons · John McCallum · Yechiel Friedlander · Michael Ortiz · Judith Simons

Research 7 August 2000 Free

A randomised crossover trial of chemotherapy in the home: patient preferences and cost analysis

Danny Rischin · Michelle A White · Jane P Matthews · Guy C Toner · Kathryn Watty · Anthony J Sulkowski · Jan L Clarke · Lois Buchanan

Subscribe to MJA email alerts

No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Thanks for Subscribing! Tell us more

Your email updates will use your name.

Good one! Your updates are coming

Thank you for subscribing to the MJA email alerts. Receive the latest content in your inbox.