Volume 199 - Issue 9

Should we screen for lung cancer in Australia?

Authors:  Paul L R Mitchell and Thomas John

Med J Aust 2013; 199 (9): 586. || doi: 10.5694/mja13.11144
Published online: 4 November 2013
To the Editor: The United States National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in lung cancer deaths among smokers screened with three low-radiation-dose computed tomography scans at yearly intervals. Hew and colleagues recently outlined the challenges in implementing such a screening program in Australia.1 However, the potential for saving lives is enormous. Currently only 14.1% of lung cancer patients survive 5 years - a marginal improvement ...

To the Editor: The United States National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in lung cancer deaths among smokers screened with three low-radiation-dose computed tomography scans at yearly intervals. Hew and colleagues recently outlined the challenges in implementing such a screening program in Australia.1 However, the potential for saving lives is enormous.

Currently only 14.1% of lung cancer patients survive 5 years — a marginal improvement from 8.7% over the period from 1982–1986 to 2006–2010.2 We estimate that the survival benefit of screening the approximately 80% of eligible smokers would push the 5-year survival rate from 14.1% to 29%. Screening beyond 3 years is likely to give even greater benefit.

A recent Victorian study indicated that 62% of smokers presenting with lung cancer had already quit smoking a median of 12 years earlier.3 The suggestion by Hew and colleagues that further smoking cessation measures are an alternative to screening would be of no benefit to those who, despite having quit, will get lung cancer over the next 10–20 years.

Measures to reduce smoking are essential, but are not an alternative to screening. Suggesting that they are is akin to saying that we shouldn’t screen for breast cancer in women taking hormone replacement therapy until it is no longer being used. This would prompt a general outcry from both the public and cancer specialists. It is also, unfortunately, another example of therapeutic nihilism in lung cancer. Uncertainty around the costs and benefits can be allayed by screening those at higher risk.4 Screening offers the only way to substantially alter survival in this disease over the next 10–20 years.


Authors


Competing interests


References


More like this

Cancer Research 18 August 2026 Open Access

Uneven Ground: Survival Differences Among Victorian Lung Cancer Patients by Location of Residence (2011–2023): A Retrospective Cohort Study

Evangeline Samuel, Eldho Paul, Mike Lloyd, Sanuki Tissera, Craig Underhill, Sagun Parakh, Phillip Parente, Inger Olesen, Javier Torres, Katharine See, Gavin M. Wright, David Langton, Thomas John, Matthew Conron, James Bartlett, Nicola Atkin, Nikolajs Zeps, Susan V. Harden, Wasek Faisal, John R. Zalcberg, Rob G. Stirling

Cancer Research 18 August 2026 Open Access

Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer With Liver-Only Metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Study Integrating Prospectively Collected Real-World Clinical and Molecular Data From an Australian National Database (2009–2024) to Guide Treatment Planning

Savio G. Barreto, Christos S. Karapetis, Shahid Ullah, Matthew Burge, Susan Caird, Angus Campbell, Azim Jalali, Ross Jennens, Muhammad A. Khattak, Belinda Lee, Stephanie H. Lim, Shehara Mendis, Louise Nott, Timothy J. Price, Jeremy D. Shapiro, Jeanne Tie, Javier Torres, Colin Williams, Rachel Wong, Vanessa Wong, Peter Gibbs

Cancer Guideline summary 13 July 2026 Open Access

Program Guidelines for the National Lung Cancer Screening Program: Targeted Lung Cancer Screening in High-Risk Individuals in Australia

Nicole M. Rankin, Rebecca Zosel, Lisa J. Whop, Raglan Maddox, Annette McWilliams, Miranda Siemienowicz, Jon Emery, Maria A. R. Lantin, Georgia Bartlett, Mikayla Wolfe, Abbey Diaz, Katrina Anderson, Lillian Liu, Cindy Toms, Sarah McDermott, Peter Bligh, Jeremy Chalke, Stephen Melsom, Claire E. Nightingale, Alison Brown, Sam Pope, Julia Brotherton, Anne Fidler, Michel Itel, Mark Brooke, Diane M. Pascoe, Fraser Brims, Tracy L. Leong, Emily Stone, Dorothy Keefe, Vivienne Milch