Doctors in support of law reform for voluntary euthanasia
Author: Roger K Woodruff
Published online: 22 July 2013
To the Editor: The Doctors for Voluntary Euthanasia Choice want Australia to have enlightened euthanasia laws similar to those of the Netherlands.1 But a recent review of Dutch physician-assisted death (PAD) suggests that such practices are extremely difficult to control.2
They state that there has been some improvement in the rate of reporting of cases of euthanasia (a legal requirement), although only 2% of deaths classifiable as euthanasia but employing morphine rather than muscle relaxants are reported.
Throughout the 1990s, it was reported that about 1000 patients a year were euthanased without request. The most common reasons given for not discussing euthanasia with these patients were that they were unconscious, they had a psychiatric disorder or dementia, or “assistance in dying was clearly in the best interest of the patient”. This provides a chilling insight into who is being killed.
In 2005 it was reported that there had been a fall in the incidence of euthanasia, but there was a compensatory rise in deaths involving palliative sedation (which do not have to be reported), and it was alleged that doctors were choosing this less administratively onerous alternative.
In the review, much is made of a special relationship between Dutch general practitioners and their patients, but one expert admits that “some physicians practice PAD without the emotional sensitivity that we have agreed is necessary”.
The latest Dutch report, for 2010, shows that the rate of euthanasia has increased again, the number of unreported cases has increased, the rate of euthanasia without request is a little lower but persists, and deaths involving palliative sedation have jumped 150% in 5 years.3
Despite claims that comprehensive regulatory mechanisms are in place, it seems that the Dutch are no closer to controlling PAD than when they started 30 years ago.
Competing interests
References
- Willoughby JO, Marr RG, Wendell-Smith CP; Doctors for Voluntary Euthanasia Choice. Doctors in support of law reform for voluntary euthanasia. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 190. 0_BABBFIDE
- Youngner SJ, Kimsma GK, editors. Physician-assisted death in perspective: assessing the Dutch experience. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 0_i1142865
- Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Penning C, et al. Trends in end-of-life practices before and after the enactment of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2010: a repeated cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2012; 380: 908-915. 0_i1142867
A future for the hospital‐in‐the‐home (HITH) deteriorating patient: shifting the paradigm
Aaron BO Wong, Brian H Le
Models of care across settings supporting ageing in place: a narrative review
Maria C Inacio, Stephanie Harrison, Johannes Schwabe, Maria Crotty, Gillian E Caughey
Implementing voluntary assisted dying in New South Wales correctional settings
Diya Ahluwalia, Leigh Haysom
Improving palliative care for people who use alcohol and other drugs
Grace FitzGerald, Jon Cook, Peter Higgs, Charles Henderson, Sione Crawford, Thileepan Naren
Inequity of access to voluntary assisted dying for New Zealand citizens residing permanently in Australia
Christopher J Barlow
Dying of heart failure: how do we improve the experience?
Dominica Zentner, Vithoosharan Sivanathan, Jennifer Philip, Natasha Smallwood