CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia

• 1 University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA.
• 2 Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.
• 3 St Vincent’s Clinical School and School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.
• 4 Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, Calif, USA.

---

• 1. Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, et al. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 100-105. <MJA full text>
• 2. Scott IA, Del Mar CB. A dog walking on its hind legs? Implications of the CareTrack study [editorial]. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 67-68. <MJA full text>
• 3. Ackermann E. Barriers to “appropriate care” in general practice. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 76-77. <MJA full text>
• 4. Wright A, Bolam B. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia [letter]. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 442. <MJA full text>
• 5. National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for acute stroke management. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2007.
• 6. Runciman WB, Coiera EW, Day RO, et al. Towards the delivery of appropriate health care in Australia. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 78-81. <MJA full text>
• 7. Buchan H, Picone D. A call for action. MJA Insight 2012; 16 Jul. http://www.mjainsight.com.au/view?post=heather-buchan-debora-picone-a-call-for-action&post_id=9945 (accessed Jul 2012).