Volume 196 - Issue 5
Inpatient subacute care in Australia: perceptions of admission and discharge barriers
Author: Kathleen McCarthy
Med J Aust 2012; 196 (5): 315. || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10178
Published online: 19 March 2012
Published online: 19 March 2012
To the Editor: The recent article by New and colleagues1 is an important piece in the “bed-block” picture, providing insight into perceived difficulties for patients on discharge, as a result of insufficient appropriate facilities.
The authors suggested that “Redistributing proposed funding for inpatient subacute beds to measures for overcoming these barriers” may improve patient flow through the whole hospital system. This idea fits well with current federal health policy that “bed equivalents” are an important aspect of innovative and flexible models of care for rehabilitation services in Australia.2 Most states are reviewing how rehabilitation services are best designed to ensure the most effective use of limited resources, both in terms of programs and workforce.
Improving the coordination of programs managed by the various levels of government, across health, disability and the aged care sectors, will help overcome the barriers identified in this study. The Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine applauds efforts to increase research on rehabilitation and patient care, and supports federal and state initiatives providing increased resources for subacute care, both within hospitals and in the community. Investment in rehabilitation services at the community level is one of the most viable solutions and will meet the needs of an ageing population. Effective community care and the proposed National Disability Insurance Scheme (http://www.ndis.gov.au), if well executed, will reduce the burden on other parts of the health and aged care sectors and help ease the burden on hospitals.
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
References
- New PW, Cameron PA, Olver JH, Stoelwinder JU. Inpatient subacute care in Australia: perceptions of admission and discharge barriers. Med J Aust 2011; 195: 538-541. 0_CHDFCDCF
- Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. A healthier future for all Australians: National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission — final report. Canberra: DoHA, June 2009. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/nhhrc-report (accessed Mar 2012).
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern