To the Editor: The “thinking doctor’s” Journal has degenerated to one for doctor’s random thoughts. The commissioned and peer reviewed article by Webber1 was disappointing. For many disenfranchised colleagues, the usual whinge over a cuppa at the local meeting is now plainly inadequate after this Medical Journal of Australia offering.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.