To the Editor: Superficially, de Crespigny and Savulescu make a compelling case for clarifying late-term abortion law.1 However, at a deeper level, it is disappointing that alternative points of view were not discussed in their article. The only solution offered in the case of a potentially imperfect child is to abort the pregnancy and try again. Unfortunately, this ignores several important issues.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
- 1 Park Family Practice, Sydney, NSW.
- 2 The Gill Medical Centre, Manchester, UK.
Correspondence: sbhgerber@gmail.com
- 1. de Crespigny LJ, Savulescu J. Pregnant women with fetal abnormalities: the forgotten people in the abortion debate. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 100-103. <MJA full text>
- 2. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM. Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006; 47: 16-24.
- 3. Family Guardian. The purpose of law. http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/Articles/PurposeOfLaw.htm (accessed May 2008).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.