Late-term abortion: what can be learned from Royal Women’s Hospital v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria?

Paul Gerber
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01260.x
Published online: 3 September 2007

In reply: Flynn points to some minor technical differences in my historical recount of the handling, by the Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria, of the complaint against the medical specialists involved in a late-term abortion.1 None requires a reply, save for Flynn’s assertion that “the Board does not currently have the power to conciliate disputes or conduct mediations”.

  • Paul Gerber

  • Melbourne, VIC.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.