Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think?
Author: John E Marley
Published online: 7 May 2007
To the Editor: Whatever the method used to select medical students (whether academic, psychometric, or interview), the basic problem in assessing the method’s predictive capability is that only candidates who perform at the higher levels in the assessment will be admitted. The only way to test the predictive validity of an assessment is to admit candidates from a much wider band of performance, creating a much less compressed score range for comparison. By definition, candidates with lower scores are excluded, thus making this analysis impossible.
The study by Groves et al had an overall response rate of 13.6%,1 a rate at which no conclusions could, or should, be drawn.
Entry to medicine remains a highly charged and emotional subject. It is unfortunate that the press has drawn conclusions from a study from which conclusions cannot be drawn.
References
- Groves MA, Gordon J, Ryan G. Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think? Med J Aust 2007; 186: 120-123. 0_BEADBJHI