Volume 186 - Issue 11

Ototoxic ear drops with grommet and tympanic membrane perforations: a position statement

Authors:  Robert J Black, Vince C Cousins, Peter Chapman, Zoran Becvarovski, Harvey L C Coates, Stephen J O’Leary, Christopher F Perry and Brian J Williams

Med J Aust 2007; 186 (11): 605-606. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01067.x
Published online: 4 June 2007

To the Editor: Systemic ototoxicity secondary to the use of aminoglycosides is well known in clinical medicine, and appropriate monitoring measures to prevent vestibulo-cochlear ototoxicity are routinely performed. Less well known is the potential for topical ear drops, particularly the aminoglycoside group, to cause both vestibular and cochlear damage when introduced through a patent grommet or tympanic membrane perforation for the treatment of infection.1 Although the incidence of aminoglycoside ototoxicity with ear drops is uncommon (for cochlear toxicity, in the order of one in 10 000 patients treated2), individual susceptibility and patient compliance problems may lead to inner ear damage.

Concerns with the potential ototoxicity of aminoglycoside ear drops has led to American,3 British4 and Canadian5 expert committees providing guidelines on the use of potentially ototoxic ear drops in patients with tympanic membrane perforations or patent grommets. The Consensus Panel of the Australian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (ASOHNS) unanimously agreed on the recommendations shown in the Box, which are based on the American guidelines.

Broadly speaking, the Consensus Panel recommends avoiding the use of ototoxic ear drops in patients with perforated tympanic membranes where possible.

The Australian National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation study showed that the non-ototoxic fluoroquinolone drops were more effective than commonly used ototoxic ear drops.1 An application to the Therapeutic Goods Administration for introduction of ciprofloxacin drops to the ear has recently been approved, and has been placed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme as an authority prescription for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children with chronic suppurative otitis media as of February 2007.

However, clinical circumstance may dictate that potentially ototoxic agents need to be used if culture/sensitivity testing suggests that fluoroquinolone drops would not be appropriate, are unavailable, or if previous treatment with fluoroquinolone ear drops failed.

The Consensus Panel did not believe routine auditory/vestibular monitoring was warranted by the risks of ototoxicity, provided the treatment was short (5–10 days).

The full document outlining the Consensus Panel’s recommendations is available from ASOHNS.


Authors


Competing interests


References