Volume 184 - Issue 1

Pethidine in emergency departments: promoting evidence-based prescribing

Author:  Paul Pielage

Med J Aust 2006; 184 (1): 44-45. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00100.x
Published online: 2 January 2006

To the Editor: I was interested to read the article by Kaye and colleagues about reducing pethidine use in the emergency department by means of evidence-based prescribing.1

In view of published reports describing the disadvantages of pethidine, it was decided in late 1996 to attempt to reduce the amount of pethidine prescribed in the emergency department of Launceston General Hospital. Narcotics were supplied as ampoules of 100 mg pethidine, 10 mg morphine, 15 mg papaveretum (the use of which was trivial) and fentanyl, which was used mainly for anaesthetic induction. Before mid-1996, 50%–72% of all ampoules of narcotics used in the emergency department were of pethidine. Of narcotics used for acute pain management, pethidine would have been much higher as a proportion because it was not used for acute pulmonary oedema, ischaemic myocardial pain, anaesthetic induction and in patients being ventilated. The use of narcotics was monitored by quarterly reports from the pharmacy department of the quantities of the various parenteral narcotics supplied to the emergency department. Papaveretum was removed from the pharmacopoeia in 1999.

In 1996, an informal education program was instituted within the emergency department, strongly supported by the nurses, with the aim of convincing junior medical staff on rotation from other areas within the hospital to prescribe morphine rather than pethidine. It had long been observed that such staff prescribed pethidine almost exclusively for acute pain management, and a cultural change was required. As shown in the Box, the percentage of narcotics dispensed as pethidine was steadily reduced over the following years, reaching 5% in 2002. After 2 years at this level it was decided to remove pethidine from the pharmacopoeia. In February of 2005, hydromorphone was introduced and pethidine removed. There have been no complaints or problems as a result, and the whole process was unexpectedly painless and successful.


Author


References