Reducing drug-related harm: Australia leads the way
Authors: David G E Caldicott and Cameron Duff
Published online: 7 February 2005
David G E Caldicott,* Cameron Duff†
* Convener, Royal Adelaide Designer Drug Academic Research (RADAR) Unit, Emergency and Trauma Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA; † Director, Centre for Youth Drug Studies, Australian Drug Foundation, Melbourne, VIC. dcaldicoATmail.rah.sa.gov.au
To the Editor: Threatened with a surge of Athenian, one-eyed jingoism regarding Australian drug policy that the recent conference report by Ritter et al1 might have elicited, we offer a warning.
Australia has achieved much to be proud of with its harm-reduction policies in recent decades. As Ritter et al attest, Australian researchers and practitioners are “leading the way” in generating political and community support for greater harm-reduction efforts. However, the implementation of real harm-reduction measures can hardly be described as “Olympian” under the current administration. Real Australian successes in the area of harm reduction have arguably occurred despite federal and state policy rather than because of it. Individual positions taken by clinicians such as Dr Alex Wodak, in the face of severe opposition and at times intimidation, account for much of this success. The sad reality is that the “Tough on drugs” approach currently pursued in Australia seems doomed to soon fuse with the Americans’ globally denounced “War on drugs”.
Real harm reduction can hardly be said to have been given a “fair go” in the past decade, with 85% of the total drugs budget in Australia committed to law enforcement — the paltry remainder split between research and treatment.2 While harm reduction strategies have been widely implemented in response to the problems associated with injecting drug use, such strategies have not been nearly as popular in our responses to other types of drug use. Harm reduction is yet to be embraced as an effective response to the problems associated with the so-called “party drugs”, despite mounting evidence of its efficacy in Europe.
Any premature triumphalism on the subject of harm reduction ought to be eschewed. Australia’s recent heritage is quietly being betrayed at a federal level. A little-publicised federal report recently called for a move away from harm minimisation and harm reduction.3 This is despite evidence indicating that functional drug use is emerging as “normal” rather than deviant behaviour among many Australians. 4 Clearly, we must redouble our efforts to ensure that harm reduction becomes a central part of Australia’s public policy stance.
In an era in which it often seems easier to succumb to the whims of our larger neighbours than to resist them, it becomes even more important that doctors and health professionals, and particularly the younger generation of researchers, stand firm. We are, after all, standing on the shoulders of giants.
References
- Ritter AJ, Wodak AD, Crofts JN. Reducing drug-related harm: Australia leads the way. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 242-243. <eMJA full text>
- Wodak A, Moore T. Modernising Australia’s drug policy. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2002. i1085673
- House of Representatives Standing Committee on Families and Community Affairs (HRSCFCA). Road to recovery: report on the Inquiry into Substance Abuse in Australian Communities. Canberra: AGPS, 2003. i1085675
- Duff C. Drugs and youth cultures: is Australia experiencing the ‘normalisation’ of adolescent drug use? J Youth Stud 2003; 6: 433-446. CHDGEGCD