Volume 181 - Issue 3

Multisite, quality-improvement collaboration to optimise cardiac care in Queensland public hospitals

Authors:  Ian A Scott, Irene C Darwin, Kathy H Harvey, Andy B Duke, Nicholas D Buckmaster, John Atherton, Hazel E Harden and Michael Ward

Med J Aust 2004; 181 (3): 175. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06222.x
Published online: 2 August 2004

In reply: We agree with Hadfield that optimising cardiac care may require extra resources targeted at increasing access of patients in regional Queensland to specific interventions, such as coronary angiography, cardiac rehabilitation and echocardiography, in addition to the quality-improvement strategies used within our collaborative. We contend that both approaches are necessary, and that the magnitude of improvement achieved by either will depend on the intensity with which they are applied. Indeed, the “high-intensity” quality-improvement hospitals in our study were defined on the basis of more funding being made available to undertake quality-improvement activities at those sites.

We concede that some of the differences in quality indicators between “high-intensity” and “low-intensity” quality-improvement hospitals may be attributable to inequities in capital expenditure on service delivery that we did not measure. However, some of the differences may have also arisen from variation in systems for identifying and referring those patients who have most to gain from receiving the care targeted by our collaborative.


Authors