Recommended therapeutic digoxin blood levels: a cause for concern
Author: Keith V Woollard
Published online: 15 September 2003
Keith V Woollard
Cardiologist, 34 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch, WA 6015. KeithWoollardATwacardiology.com.au
To the Editor: The recent review of digoxin by Campbell and MacDonald1 pointed out that a serum digoxin level of over 1.0 ng/mL is associated with excess mortality. Indeed, higher blood levels (≥ 1.2 ng/mL) are associated with higher crude rates for all-cause hospitalisation, and for increased hospitalisation for worsening heart failure or suspected digoxin toxicity.2
The post hoc analysis of the DIG trial2 suggests that the optimal range is 0.5–0.8 ng/mL.
I recently surveyed 31 private pathology laboratories across Australia to determine their recommendations about the therapeutic range of serum levels of digoxin. In summary, their recommendations ranged from a lower limit between 0.5 ng/mL and 1.0 ng/mL, and an upper limit between 1.6 ng/mL and 2.1 ng/mL. Twenty-six of the 31 suggested that values below 0.8 ng/mL were subtherapeutic. It is likely that many doctors will heed such advice and inappropriately increase the dose of digoxin in patients being treated for heart failure.
It is possible that adverse effects will flow from current laboratory industry recommendations, and these should be revised.
References
- Campbell TJ, MacDonald PS. Digoxin in heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias. Med J Aust 2003; 179: 98-102. <eMJA full text>
- Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Wang Y, et al. Association of serum digoxin concentration and outcomes in patients with heart failure. JAMA 2003; 289: 871-878. i1082814
Fatty Liver Disease in Australia: A Narrative Review on the Epidemiology, Natural History, Prognostication and Management in People With Metabolic Dysfunction
Karl Vaz, Daniel Clayton-Chubb, William W. Kemp, Stuart K. Roberts, Ammar Majeed
Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of People With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, New South Wales, 2011–2020: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Adam C. Livori, Jedidiah I. Morton, Dianna J. Magliano, Jonathan E. Shaw
Rethinking Rheumatic Fever Diagnosis: Progress, Pitfalls and the Path Towards a Definitive Test
Anna P. Ralph, Rachel Webb, Tom Parks, Nicole J. Moreland, Asha C. Bowen, Benjamin Jones, Emma Ndagire, Andrea Z. Beaton
Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of People With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, New South Wales, 2011–2020: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Samia Kazi, Simone Marschner, Clara K. Chow
Distribution of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Based on the Updated 2023 Guideline-Recommended Australian Cardiovascular Disease Risk Algorithm and Comparison With the 2012 Algorithm: An Observational Study
Nina Lazarevic, Meghana Bhat, Grace Joshy, Danielle C. Butler, Mark Woodward, Anushka Patel, Rod T. Jackson, Garry Jennings, Rosemary Wyber, Ellie Paige, Emily Banks
They Brought the Hospital to Me
Hugh N. Burrill