Gestational diabetes mellitus: accuracy of Midwives Data Collection
Authors: Robert G Moses, Alison J Webb and Christine D Comber
Published online: 18 August 2003
Robert G Moses,* Alison J Webb,† Christine D Comber‡
* Clinical Director, † Nurse, Diabetes Service; ‡ Nurse, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Illawarra Area Health Service, PO Box W58, Wollongong West, NSW, 2500. mosesrATiahs.nsw.gov.au
To the Editor: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is glucose intolerance of variable severity with onset or first recognition during the current pregnancy.1 GDM is one of the conditions requiring an entry on the New South Wales Midwives Data Form. Effective healthcare planning is dependent on accurate data collection. To our knowledge, the verity of the midwives data with respect to GDM, or indeed other entities, has not been checked for many years.
A previous article has demonstrated that the accuracy of GDM data collection is poor, with the incidence of GDM being under-reported.2 Recently, an article from Victoria also showed a recorded rate of GDM about half that of the acknowledged incidence.3 We have recently completed a review of compliance with GDM testing in our area and, knowing the true incidence of GDM, this has allowed us to revisit the accuracy of the data being recorded on the Midwives Data Collection Form.
In the city of Wollongong, NSW, with a population of around 280 000 and about 3000 births each year, all deliveries take place at two public hospitals (Wollongong and Shellharbour) and a private hospital (Illawarra Private Hospital). It is the policy of both the Obstetric Department and the Division of General Practice that all pregnant women should be tested for GDM in accord with the ADIPS guidelines.4
All women who delivered at the three hospitals over the 6-month period from January 2002 to June 2002 were identified from the Labour Ward records. A hospital-based delivery is used by 99.3% of women in the area.5 The results of testing for GDM were determined for all of these women.
There were 1655 deliveries at the three hospitals over the 6-month period. Seven women with known type 1 or type 2 diabetes were excluded, leaving 1648 women whose data could be examined. Women were considered to have been tested for GDM (n = 1518) if they had had either a glucose tolerance test (n = 1502) or a glucose challenge test (n = 16). There were 101 women diagnosed with GDM, giving an overall incidence rate of 6.6% (prenatal clinic, 7.1%; shared-care, 6.6%; private patients, 6.3%).
The most recent midwives data indicate an incidence of 5.7% at the public hospitals and 3.1% at the private hospital. It is thus apparent that the official statistics still underestimate the incidence of GDM. A similar degree of error may also be found for other entries, and hence data should be extrapolated with caution.
A redesign of the collection form may help remove some of the errors and omissions. For the question regarding GDM, we feel accuracy could be enhanced if there were separate “Yes” and “No” boxes, rather than a single check box. This might encourage further consideration of the problem. Accuracy could be further enhanced by allowing space for the glucose tolerance test results at 0 and 2 hours — these would also be useful data in their own right.
References
- American Diabetes Association. Clinical Practice Recommendations. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2002; 25 (Suppl 1): S94-S96. CBBIEFGA
- Moses RG, Colagiuri S. The extent of undiagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus in New South Wales. Med J Aust 1997; 167: 14-16. i1082812
- Stone CA, McLachlan KA, Halliday JL, et al. Gestational diabetes in Victoria in 1996: incidence, risk factors and outcomes. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 486-491. i1082815
- Hoffman L, Nolan C, Wilson JD, et al. Gestational diabetes — management guidelines. The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 93-97. i1082818
- Public Health Division. New South Wales Mothers and Babies 2000. Sydney: NSW Health, 2001. i1082820