Volume 178 - Issue 3

Responses to access block in Australia: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Medical Division

Authors:  Richard E Ruffin and Jan K Hooper

Med J Aust 2003; 178 (3): 104-105. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05094.x
Published online: 3 February 2003
Interventions

In a progressive response to reducing access block, the hospital has adopted a range of strategies.

  • In 1996, an Interface Unit based within the Division of Medicine was developed to coordinate and facilitate early discharge from the wards and avoid unnecessary admissions from the ED by initiating treatment/management for patients with conditions that may be managed at home but require additional support. The nurses in this unit "broker" or organise external therapy or services (such as subcutaneous heparin for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis, or home supports for someone who is frail and would otherwise have been admitted to hospital) in association with the patient's general practitioner.

  • With the loss of nursing home beds from the western Adelaide region, a step-down unit was created in the hospital with a lower registered/enrolled nursing skill mix. An active multidisciplinary team facilitates placing patients in RCFs or at home, with additional resources provided through brokered community services or State-based programs, such as the Adelaide Transition Alliance (which provides respite beds in RCFs) or with the Division of Surgery's "Hospital in the Home" program (which provides post-acute home nursing services from within the division's nursing resources).

  • A transit bay of six beds for incoming (ED) and outgoing (discharge) patients has been created. In addition, overcapacity beds (ie, accepting an additional patient into a ward before a patient has been discharged) have been used, and day beds have been used for non-same-day inpatients.

  • Emphasis has been placed on promoting appropriate admission and appropriate day stay, with audits conducted by senior nurses from the Interface Unit based on accepted clinical criteria.

  • Early discharge remains a priority, and is reinforced at medical handover meetings held each morning to review new admissions, facilitate transfer of care, and provide clinical inservice.

  • Home care specialist nurses have also helped prevent admissions (eg, heart failure nurses, home cancer therapy and respiratory care nurses). A "medical flying squad" was established to assess nursing home patients and was clinically effective in reducing transfers from the RCF to the ED, but was too costly to sustain.

  • A GP service located within the ED was unsuccessful because of low numbers of triage category level 4 and 5 patients. A further issue was that it sometimes involved a GP referring to another GP.


Authors