The impact of Victoria’s real time prescription monitoring system (SafeScript) on a cohort of people who inject drugs
Author: Malcolm Dobbin
Published online: 15 March 2021
To the Editor: Fetene and colleagues1 describe refusal to prescribe or dispense prescriptions to some of their study cohort of people who inject drugs (PWIDs) and concern that their mental health treatment needs may not be met due to SafeScript, Victoria’s real time prescription monitoring system. SafeScript is a live electronic database providing information about the prescribing and dispensing of monitored medicines to each patient, instantly available in real time on a prescriber’s or pharmacist’s desktop (https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/safescript).
SafeScript alerts prescribers and pharmacists to the risk of uncoordinated treatment by multiple providers or to the overdose risk of drug–drug interactions. Prescribers and pharmacists may have responded appropriately by offering more effective treatments instead of providing a continued supply of the medication. For instance, benzodiazepines are not recommended for first line or prolonged treatment of anxiety.
Many people who misuse drugs have comorbid mental health disorders and need medical support. SafeScript is helping to identify this group of at‐risk patients so they can receive the appropriate medical treatment they require.
SafeScript provides a clinical decision support system for prescribers and pharmacists, enabling more informed decisions for safer prescribing or dispensing of high risk monitored medicines. By providing proactive alerts, strong real time prescription monitoring systems, such as SafeScript, reduce overdose deaths from prescription opioids2 and decrease the number of opioid prescriptions, diversion, and opioid‐related morbidity and substance use disorder outcomes.3 Since the rollout of SafeScript, the number of multiple provider episodes and the average morphine equivalent dose have both been trending gradually but consistently downwards.
SafeScript was designed with the lessons learnt from the United States. The implementation of this system included several measures to encourage and support a professional response for high risk patients, such as podcasts and face to face and online training, in which more than 4500 prescribers and pharmacists have participated. Furthermore, the SafeScript implementation included upgrading the Drug and Alcohol Clinical Advisory Service, providing trained general practitioner clinical advisors to offer peer support, a consumer pharmaceutical helpline, and increased funding to support professionals and consumers manage benzodiazepine problems. In addition, $273.1 million were invested in drug treatment, support and harm reduction services in 2019–2020,4 representing a 65% increase in investment through the last five Victorian state budgets.
This new initiative helps prescribers and pharmacists provide the appropriate clinical care and professional response needed by high risk patients.
Competing interests
References
- Fetene DL, Higgs P, Nielsen S, et al. The impact of Victoria’s real time prescription monitoring system (SafeScript) on a cohort of people who inject drugs. Med J Aust 2020; 213: 141. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/213/3/impact-victorias-real-time-prescription-monitoring-system-safescript-cohort
- Cerda M, Ponicki WR, Smith N, et al. Measuring relationships between proactive reporting state-level prescription drug monitoring programs and county-level fatal prescription opioid overdoses. Epidemiology 2020; 31: 32–42.
- Puac-Polanco V, Chihuri S, Fink DS, et al. Prescription drug monitoring programs and prescription opioid-related outcomes in the United States. Epidemiol Rev 2020; https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxaa002 [Epub ahead of print].
- Victorian Government Department of Treasury and Finance. 2020/21 State budget papers: budget paper 3 — service delivery. https://www.budget.vic.gov.au/budget-papers (viewed Feb 2021).
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern