Where to next for rural general practice policy and research in Australia?

Lucie K Walters, Matthew R McGrail, Dean B Carson, Belinda G O'Sullivan, Deborah J Russell, Roger P Strasser, Richard B Hays and Max Kamien
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00216
Published online: 17 July 2017

The available evidence from the past 20 years of government interventions can inform future priorities

Australia is in a critical period of rural workforce policy reform. The Australian government is responding to a surge of domestic and international doctors, while addressing the pervasive problem of geographic and specialty maldistribution.1 There is renewed commitment to strengthen rural health policy and further develop a well skilled, adaptable rural general practitioner workforce. GPs underpin resilient, healthy rural and remote communities and are essential for a coordinated and efficient health system.2 This article seeks to inform future directions and research priorities by reflecting on 20 years of policy activity and outcomes.

  • 1 Flinders University Rural Clinical School, Mt Gambier, SA
  • 2 School of Rural Health, Monash University, Churchill, VIC
  • 3 Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT
  • 4 Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Laurentian University and Lakehead University, Sudbury, Canada
  • 5 Mount Isa Centre for Rural and Remote Health, James Cook University, Mt Isa, QLD
  • 6 University of Western Australia, Perth, WA

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Mason J. Review of Australian Government Health Workforce Programs. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2013. (accessed May 2017).
  • 2. Wakerman J, Humphreys JS. Sustainable workforce and sustainable health systems for rural and remote Australia. Med J Aust 2013; 199 (5 Suppl): S14-S17. <MJA full text>
  • 3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Medical workforce 2015 additional material. (accessed June 2017).
  • 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Medical workforce 2011 (AIHW Cat. No. HWL 49; National Health Workforce Series No. 3.). Canberra: AIHW, 2013. (accessed June 2017).
  • 5. Australian Government Department of Health. General practice statistics. (accessed May 2017).
  • 6. McGrail MR, Humphreys JS, Joyce CM, et al. How do rural GPs’ workloads and work activities differ with community size compared with metropolitan practice? Aust J Prim Health 2012; 18: 228-233.
  • 7. McGrail MR, Russell DJ. Australia’s rural medical workforce: Supply from its medical schools against career stage, gender and rural-origin. Aust J Rural Health 2016; doi: 10.1111/ajr.12323 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 8. Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, Eley DS, Ranmuthugala G, et al. Determinants of rural practice: positive interaction between rural background and rural undergraduate training. Med J Aust 2015; 202: 41-46. <MJA full text>
  • 9. Sen Gupta T, Woolley T, Murray R, et al. Positive impacts on rural and regional workforce from the first seven cohorts of James Cook University medical graduates. Rural Remote Health 2014; 14: 2657.
  • 10. Wilkinson D, Laven G, Pratt N, et al. Impact of undergraduate and postgraduate rural training, and medical school entry criteria on rural practice among Australian general practitioners: national study of 2414 doctors. Med Educ 2003; 37: 809-814.
  • 11. McGrail MR, Russell DJ, Campbell DG. Vocational training of general practitioners in rural locations is critical for Australian rural medical workforce supply. Med J Aust 2016; 205: 216-221. <MJA full text>
  • 12. Commonwealth of Australia. Australian general practice training program distribution model review: Discussion paper Canberra: Department of Health, 2016.
  • 13. KBC Australia. Evaluation of the Remote Vocational Training Scheme – impact and outcomes: Final report. Orange: KBC, 2016.
  • 14. Russell D, McGrail M. How does the workload and work activities of procedurally-active GPs compare to non-procedural GPs. Aust J Rural Health 2016; doi: 10.1111/ajr.12321 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 15. Russell D, Humphreys JS, McGrail MR, et al. The value of survival analyses for evidence-based rural medical workforce planning. Hum Resour Health 2013; 11: 65.
  • 16. Sen Gupta T, Manahan D, Lennox D, et al. The Queensland Health Rural medical generalist pathway: providing a medical workforce for the bush. Rural Remote Health 2012; 13: 2319.
  • 17. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing. Lost in the labyrinth: report on the inquiry into registration processes and support for overseas trained doctors. Canberra: Parliament of Australia, 2012. (accessed May 2017).
  • 18. Hawthorne L. International medical migration: what is the future for Australia? Med J Aust 2013; 199 (5 Suppl): S18-S21. <MJA full text>
  • 19. Gibbon P, Hales J. Review of the Rural Retention Program - Final report. Canberra: Australian Government – Department of Health and Ageing, 2006.
  • 20. Li J, Scott A, McGrail M, et al. Retaining rural doctors: Doctors’ preferences for rural medical workforce incentives. Soc Sci Med 2014; 121: 56-64.
  • 21. Scott A, Witt J, Humphreys J, et al. Getting doctors into the bush: general practitioners’ preferences for rural location. Soc Sci Med 2013; 9: 33-44.
  • 22. Humphreys JS, Jones MP, Jones JA, et al. Workforce retention in rural and remote Australia: determining the factors that influence length of practice. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 472-476. <MJA full text>
  • 23. Jackson C. Review of after hours primary health care. Report to the Minister for Health and Minister for Sport. Canberra: Department of Health, 2015. (accessed May 2017).
  • 24. Communio. Review of the National Rural Locum Program – Final report – April 2011. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2011. (accessed May 2017).


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.