Pandemic influenza testing at the coalface: time for reassessment?

David W Smith, David J Speers and Rodney A Bowman
Med J Aust 2010; 192 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03625.x
Published online: 3 May 2010

To the Editor: In their recent article, Beaman and Leung raised a number of important and pertinent issues about what we can learn from the influenza pandemic of 2009.1 However, we would like to correct a number of misconceptions on their part, including claims that Western Australia’s central public reference laboratory, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, (i) unreasonably favoured polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing over antigen testing; (ii) rationed and prioritised testing primarily because of inability to cope with the high demand; (iii) rarely achieved the benchmark turnaround time of 48 hours; and (iv) spent excessive time processing a large number of specimens, of which 96% were reported as negative.

  • David W Smith
  • David J Speers
  • Rodney A Bowman

  • Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Perth, WA.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.