Connect
MJA
MJA

Features of effective primary health care models in rural and remote Australia: a case-study analysis

John Wakerman, John S Humphreys, Robert Wells, Pim Kuipers, Judith A Jones, Philip Entwistle and Leigh Kinsman
Med J Aust 2009; 191 (2): 88-91.

Summary

Objective: To describe the factors and processes that facilitate or inhibit implementation, sustainability and generalisation of effective models of primary health care (PHC) service delivery in rural and remote Australia.

Design: Case-study approach, including review of relevant literature, interviews with key informants, site visits and direct observation. Thematic analysis and template analysis were used with interview transcripts. An expert reference group provided feedback and advice on policy relevance.

Setting and participants: Six PHC services in small communities across rural and remote Australia were selected based on results of a previous systematic review; they reflected diverse rural and remote settings and PHC models, and the multidisciplinary nature of PHC. Sites were visited, and 55 individuals associated with the establishment and operation of these services were interviewed between July 2006 and December 2007.

Results: Independent and template analysis confirmed the usefulness of a conceptual framework, which identified three key “environmental enablers” — supportive policy; federal and state/territory relations; and community readiness — and five essential service requirements — governance, management and leadership; funding; linkages; infrastructure; and workforce supply. Systematically addressing each of these factors improves effectiveness and lessens the threat to service sustainability.

Conclusions: Evidence from existing effective rural and remote PHC services can inform the health care reform agenda, in Australia and other countries. The evidence highlights the need for improved governance, management and community involvement, as well as strong, visionary political leadership to achieve a more responsive and better coordinated health system which could help eliminate existing health status differentials between cities and rural areas. In Australia, establishment of a single national health system, operationalised at a regional level, would obviate much of the current inefficiency and poor coordination.

  • John Wakerman1
  • John S Humphreys2
  • Robert Wells3,4
  • Pim Kuipers1
  • Judith A Jones2
  • Philip Entwistle1
  • Leigh Kinsman2

  • 1 Centre for Remote Health, Flinders University and Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, NT.
  • 2 School of Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, VIC.
  • 3 Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.
  • 4 College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.


Acknowledgements: 

We are grateful to the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute for its support of this study, and to the members of our reference group: Professor Ray Pong (Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research, Canada), Professor Martha Macleod (University of Northern British Columbia, Canada), Kim Snowball (Department of Health, Western Australia), Alma Quick (Office of Rural Health, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing [DoHA]), Gordon Gregory (National Rural Health Alliance), Dr Ian Cameron (New South Wales Rural Doctors Network) and Mark Thomann (Office for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health, DoHA).

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural, regional and remote health: indicators of health status and determinants of health. Canberra: AIHW, 2008. (AIHW Cat. No. PHE 97; Rural Health Series No. 9.)
  • 2. Wakerman J, Humphreys J. Rural and remote health — definitions, policy and priorities. In: Liaw S, Kilpatrick S, editors. A textbook of Australian rural health. Canberra: Australian Rural Health Education Network, 2008.
  • 3. Hart JT. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971; 1: 405-412.
  • 4. Humphreys JS. Translating rural health policy into effective practice: barriers and solutions. In: McSwan D, McShane M, editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Issues Affecting Rural Communities; 1994 Jul 10–15; Townsville, Qld.
  • 5. Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Wells R. What do we mean by sustainable rural health services? Implications for rural health research. Aust J Rural Health 2006; 14: 33-35.
  • 6. Wakerman J, Humphreys JS, Wells R, et al. Primary health care delivery models in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 276.
  • 7. Shannon C, Wakerman J, Hill P, et al. Achievements in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health. Darwin: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health, 2003.
  • 8. World Health Organization. Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma Ata USSR, 6–12 September 1978. Geneva: WHO, 1978.
  • 9. Wakerman J, Humphreys J, Wells R, et al. A systematic review of primary health care delivery models in rural and remote Australia 1993–2006. Canberra: Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, 2006. http://www.anu. edu.au/aphcri/Domain/RuralRemote/Final_25_Wakerman.pdf (accessed Mar 2009).
  • 10. Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Wells R, et al. “Beyond workforce”: a systemic solution for health service provision in small rural and remote communities. Med J Aust 2007; 188 (8 Suppl): S77-S80. <MJA full text>
  • 11. Stanley-Davies P, Battye K. The Division with the vision: development of the North West Queensland Allied Health Service by North and West Queensland Primary Health Care. Evaluation of Stage 1. Townsville, Qld: NWQPHC, 2004.
  • 12. Cromwell D, Senior K, Owen A, et al. Can the National Palliative Care Strategy be translated into a model of care that works for rural Australia? An answer from the Griffith Area Palliative Care Service (GAPS) experience. Wollongong, NSW: Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong, 2003.
  • 13. Local Evaluation Team. Jirntangku Miyrta Katherine West Coordinated Care Trial final report. Darwin: Menzies School of Health Research, 2000.
  • 14. Cameron I. Finding solutions in north west NSW: “easy entry, gracious exit” and the Rural and Remote Medical Services (RARMS) experience. In: Practice made perfect? Conference proceedings and outcomes. NSW Rural Doctors Network; Coffs Harbour, NSW; 23–24 Feb 2005: 8-12. http://www.nswrdn.com.au/client_images/246234.pdf (accessed Jun 2009).
  • 15. Snowball K. Multipurpose services — a potential solution for rural health and aged care. Aust J Rural Health 1994; 2: 37-40.
  • 16. Campbell A. The evaluation of a model of primary mental health care in rural Tasmania. Aust J Rural Health 2005; 13: 142-148.
  • 17. Green J. The use of focus groups in research into health. In: Saks M, Allsop J, editors. Researching health: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. London: Sage, 2007.
  • 18. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 19. World Health Organization. The world health report 2008. Primary health care — now more than ever. Geneva: WHO, 2008.
  • 20. Wakerman J. Innovative rural and remote primary health care models: what do we know and what are the research priorities? Aust J Rural Health 2009; 17: 21-26.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.