To the Editor: Skov puts the case for an alcohol taxation policy in Australia.1 Few people, if any, in public health would disagree that alcohol is a serious public health issue in Australia, and few would doubt that higher prices will reduce consumption. But why tax the consumers directly? Why not tax the providers?
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
Correspondence: g.mooney@westnet.com.au
- 1. Skov SJ; Royal Australasian College of Physicians Alcohol Advisory Group. Alcohol taxation policy in Australia: public health imperatives for action. Med J Aust 2009; 190: 437-439. [Published online ahead of print 16 Mar 2009.] <MJA full text>
- 2. Alcohol Policy Coalition. Marketing and advertising of alcohol — policy statement. http://www.cancervic.org.au/downloads/ceu/prevent/alcohol/policy_statement_marketing_advertising.pdf (accessed Apr 2009).
- 3. Shanahan L. $1.6 billion hole after alcopop tax fizzles. The Age (Melbourne) 2009; 19 Mar. http://www.theage.com.au/national/16-billion-hole-after-alcopop-tax-fizzles-20090318-926j.html?page=-1 (accessed May 2009).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.