The Australian Government’s Review of Positron Emission Tomography: an open door

Philip Davies
Med J Aust 2004; 180 (12): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06126.x
Published online: 21 June 2004

Ware, Francis and Read (page 627) express some concerns about the processes used in the Australian government’s decisions about funding for positron emission tomography (PET). We appreciate the Journal’s invitation to comment. I will briefly describe the workings of the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC), the particular processes that have been undertaken in respect of PET, and the recommendations and funding decisions that flowed from those processes.

  • Philip Davies

  • Australian Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, ACT.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.