Ware, Francis and Read (page 627) express some concerns about the processes used in the Australian government’s decisions about funding for positron emission tomography (PET). We appreciate the Journal’s invitation to comment. I will briefly describe the workings of the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC), the particular processes that have been undertaken in respect of PET, and the recommendations and funding decisions that flowed from those processes.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.