In reply: Epidemiological modelling (including economic modelling) and its role in preventive drug therapy
Authors: Danny Liew, John J McNeil, Anna Peeters, Stephen S Lim and Theo Vos
Published online: 17 February 2003
In reply: We agree with Johnson and Lassere about the value of longitudinal studies, especially clinical trials, in assessing healthcare benefits and costs. They are critical to informing clinical practice and health policy.
If it were possible to conduct these studies across a wide variety of settings, representing the range of "real life" practice, then there would be little need for epidemiological modelling. However, this is not possible. Clinical trials (with or without cost components) will only ever be conducted over relatively short durations, on circumscribed populations and under tightly controlled conditions.
A key, but often overlooked, issue is whether the results of studies are externally valid (generalisable). Indeed, the evidence base that dictates clinical practice and health policy should comprise data that are both internally and externally valid.
We do not suggest that epidemiological modelling replace longitudinal studies (in fact, modelling depends critically on robust prospective data); rather, it complements these studies by providing a means to assess their external validity.
We are also mindful of the limitations of epidemiological modelling, as outlined in our article,1 and acknowledge the importance of ensuring rigour in the methods.
Our article dealt with generating the data needed for sound economic evaluation, by taking into account the long-term benefits, risks and costs of treatment strategies, and "real-life" health service conditions. This is distinct from the issue of whether "conditional listing" on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme should be implemented for drugs that are yet to be proven cost-effective.
References
- Liew D, McNeil JJ, Peeters A, et al. Epidemiological modelling (including economic modelling) and its role in preventive drug therapy. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 364-367. <eMJA full text>
Still Treating Yesterday's Risk? Reconsidering Antiviral Use for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Cases in a Broadly Immune Population
Hadar Mudrik-Zohar, Tim Cutfield, Susan Morpeth, Thomas Hills, Eamon Duffy, Laura J. Edwards, Allen C. Cheng, Steven Y. C. Tong
Birth prevalence, clinical sequelae, and management of congenital cytomegalovirus infections in Australia, 1999–2023: a national prospective study
Ece Egilmezer, Suzy M Teutsch, Carlos Nunez, Stuart T Hamilton, Adam W Bartlett, Pamela Palasanthiran, Elizabeth J Elliott, William D Rawlinson
Medication delivery and dispensing interval preferences of people who use antihypertensive medications in Australia: a survey study
Carissa Bonner, Michael A Fajardo, Rachael M Keast, Emily Atkins, Niamh Chapman, Kristie R Weir, Anthony Rodgers, Aletta E Schutte
Concurrent use of hormonal long‐acting reversible contraception by women of reproductive age dispensed teratogenic medications, Australia, 2013–2021
Michelle KY Chen, Adrian Lim, Deshan F Sebaratnam
Concurrent use of hormonal long‐acting reversible contraception by women of reproductive age dispensed teratogenic medications, Australia, 2013–2021
Aaron E Boyce, Tony Caccetta, Jo‐Ann See, Rosemary L Nixon AM