We are waiting for the details — without these the plan will fail
The Rudd hospital reform plan1 could be better. That said, it does have the potential to be a significant improvement over what we have now. No doubt it would be better to have one level of government assume 100% of health funding. But that was never going to happen. So it’s time to accept that and move on.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
- Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW.
Correspondence: keagar@uow.edu.au
- 1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. A National Health and Hospitals Network for Australia’s future. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2010. http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/nhhn-report-toc/$FILE/NHHN%20-%20Full%20report.pdf (accessed Mar 2010, link updated Apr 2010).
- 2. NSW Health. Resource distribution formula. Technical paper, 2005 revision. Sydney: NSW Health, 2005. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2005/rdf_paper.html (accessed Mar 2010).
- 3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australia's environment: issues and trends, Jan 2010. Canberra: ABS, 2010. (ABS Cat. No. 4613.0.) http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4613.0Chapter20Jan +2010 (accessed Mar 2010).
- 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian hospital statistics 2007–08. Health Services Series no. 33. Canberra: AIHW, 2009. (AIHW Cat. No. HSE 71.)
- 5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population distribution, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2006. Canberra: ABS, 2007. (ABS Cat. No. 4705.0.) http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4705.0 Main+Features12006?OpenDocument (accessed Mar 2010).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.