To the Editor: The recently published article by McAlister and colleagues1 highlights the importance of health care organisations becoming aware of their environmental impact. However, there are several misconceptions inherent in the analysis.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
- 1. McAlister S, Barratt AL, Bell KJ, McGain F. The carbon footprint of pathology testing. Med J Aust 2020; 212: 377–382. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/212/8/carbon-footprint-pathology-testing
- 2. Lopez JB, Badrick T; ad hoc IFCC Panel on the Environmental Responsibility of Clinical Laboratories; APFCB Laboratory Management Committee. Proposals for the mitigation of the environmental impact of clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50: 1559–1564.
- 3. Tennison I. Indicative carbon emissions per unit of healthcare activity [briefing No. 23]. Cambridge: Eastern Region Public Health Observatory, NHS Sustainable Development Unit; 2010. https://www.sduhealth.org.uk/documents/publications/Bed_Days1.pdf (viewed May 2020).
- 4. Zhi M, Ding EL, Theisen‐Toupal J, et al. The landscape of inappropriate laboratory testing: a 15‐year meta‐analysis. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e78962.
- 5. O'Sullivan JW, Albasri A, Nicholson BD, et al. Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e018557.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
No relevant disclosures.