Connect
MJA
MJA

Unintended consequences of a cautious approach to e‐cigarette laws

Colin P Mendelsohn and Alex D Wodak
Med J Aust 2019; 211 (4) || doi: 10.5694/mja2.50263
Published online: 19 August 2019

To the Editor: We agree with Catalano and colleagues1 that nicotine liquid needs to be regulated. However, we feel that their letter overstates the risk from nicotine poisoning.

The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.


  • 1 UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW.


Correspondence: c.mendelsohn@unsw.edu.au

Competing interests:

We are unpaid directors of the Australian Tobacco Harm Reduction Association (ATHRA), a health promotion charity established to reduce the harm from tobacco smoking (www.athra.org.au). ATHRA has received unconditional donations from e‐cigarette businesses in the past. Neither author has or has ever had a financial or commercial relationship with any e‐cigarette or tobacco company. [Correction added on 06 August 2019, after first online publication: new disclosures have been added.]

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.