Connect
MJA
MJA

Lung cancer screening for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: an opportunity to address health inequities

Alison Brown, Gail Garvey, Nicole M Rankin, Claire Nightingale and Lisa J Whop
Med J Aust || doi: 10.5694/mja2.52084
Published online: 11 September 2023

The implementation of a national Lung Cancer Screening Program (LCSP), commencing in July 2025, presents a significant opportunity to have an impact on an intractable health problem for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.1 Lung cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.2 The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander age‐standardised incidence rate was 85.2 cases per 100 000 for 2009–2013 and the mortality rate was 56.8 deaths per 100 000, which are double the rates found in non‐Indigenous populations.2 Lung cancer mortality rates for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are increasing, in contrast to falling rates in non‐Indigenous Australians.2 These diverging trends are expected to increase disparities for many years to come and clearly demonstrate the health system is failing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The disproportionate lung cancer burden means that an LCSP could deliver greater benefits to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and reduce the disparity with non‐Indigenous Australians.

International trials demonstrate the clinical effectiveness and potential benefits of an LCSP, through low dose computed tomography (LDCT), including identifying disease at an early stage where survival rates are substantially improved.3,4 The outcomes of existing LCSPs in high income countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom show these results can be achieved in communities with high levels of socio‐economic deprivation (eg, Lung Health Check in the UK).5 Aotearoa New Zealand has demonstrated the cost‐effectiveness of an LCSP to reduce population level inequities in lung cancer for the Māori population. Māori people will achieve greater per capita health gains compared with non‐Māori people due to higher rates of tobacco use and higher incidence and mortality from lung cancer.6 Currently, there are Māori‐led implementation trials to provide evidence on strategies that optimise an LCSP for the Māori population, including determining the most effective recruitment strategies (comparing participation via general practitioners versus a central hub).7

Australia is to implement a national LCSP, with the Australian Government funding a risk‐tailored LCSP. The program will identify and refer individuals aged 50–70 years with a history of cigarette smoking of at least 30 pack‐years, and, if they had formally smoked, had quit within the previous ten years, for an LDCT scan via a medical practitioner.3,8

An understanding of historical and cultural contexts of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander wellbeing in a settler colonial state is essential. Tobacco use and lower rates of participation in existing cancer screening programs reflect the legacy of over two centuries of racism, colonisation, genocide and dispossession of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, creating the social, economic and political context for health care exclusion. A one‐size‐fits‐all approach will not work, as already evidenced in the broader health care system. An equitable LCSP requires ensuring a good fit between the program and the specific contexts within which it will be implemented.9

Although the need for an equitable approach to an LCSP in Australia has been previously identified,3 much remains unknown about suitable implementation strategies to meet the needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and communities. The 2023–24 federal budget included funding to ensure mainstream cancer care services are culturally safe and accessible to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.10 However, we argue that an equity lens must be applied to designing and implementing an LCSP with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participation at the core of program design rather than a post hoc alteration to a mainstream program. Principles to guide the codesign of an LCSP with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples do exist.11,12 To ensure equitable access, the design of an LCSP must address known barriers to existing cancer screening programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, while gathering LCSP‐specific evidence of enablers to implementation.

Leveraging knowledge from existing cancer screening programs

Existing bowel, breast and cervical cancer screening programs have failed to provide equitable outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, with low reported participation, high screening positivity, low diagnostic assessment rates, and high age‐standardised incidence and mortality for these cancers.2,13,14,15

Barriers for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples participating in existing cancer screening programs are known and include understanding the benefits of screening, fear or shame associated with the screen or cancer diagnosis, and a lack of awareness of cancer screening.16,17 US research indicates that low awareness of the LCSP and its benefits is a significant barrier to engaging communities.18

Known logistical barriers to screening participation, particularly for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in rural and remote communities, include transport, accommodation and associated costs.16,19 Service level barriers include a lack of culturally safe services and communication and language barriers.20 Culturally safe services comprise practitioners who have reflected on and understand how their cultural identity shapes their health care practice and can then apply this knowledge to provide safe, respectful and empowering care to a person of another culture.12 These long‐standing structural barriers embedded broadly into the health system result in exclusion or inappropriate care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and lead to mistrust of mainstream health services.20

The complexity of lung cancer screening presents additional challenges

The LCSP may result in additional barriers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ participation. LCSP requirements for targeted recruitment, complex shared decision‐making processes, and referral for an LDCT by a GP will place additional resource implications on an already scarce and limited workforce servicing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.21 Access barriers faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living across rural and remote Australia need to be addressed, for example, through a mobile lung cancer LDCT screening program.

Lung cancer risk assessment tools that inform LDCT referral decisions have not yet been validated in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. Validation will require engagement with key stakeholders to identify critical risk factors, the ability to routinely collect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status in the health services that provide lung cancer investigation and management, and ensuring that race is not used as a proxy factor for more relevant socio‐economic risk factors.22

Delivery of lung cancer screening must be culturally safe and appropriate

Promoting awareness of lung cancer screening and its benefits among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and health professionals who work with them is fundamental to access. Successful promotional strategies for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples used in existing cancer screening programs include promotional campaigns tailored to local communities, the use of peer educators and community champions, and promoting positive messages and emotions toward screening, could inform LCSP strategies.16,17

Developing strong, trusting relationships with clinicians and health services, is effective in increasing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participation in breast and cervical screening programs20,23 and will be important in an LCSP. BreastScreen Australia has had a focus on cultural safety through codesign of resources and a flexible approach to service delivery, including the use of mobile vans. Similarly, bowel screening participation increased in a pilot of an alternative pathway for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples developed in consultation with communities, which resulted in the distribution and explanation of tests via known and trusted local health care workers.24 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health care professionals and services are essential to building strong relationships. Aboriginal community controlled health services have enabled and fostered culturally safe programs and access to cancer screening programs through initiatives such as making group bookings for community members and providing group travel to and from screening.17,25

Smoking cessation is integral to an LCSP, and trials have demonstrated higher quit rates than in the general population.3 As smoking is a leading contributor to disease burden for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, smoking cessation delivered through an LCSP is an important primary prevention mechanism for lung cancer as well as delivering other health benefits. Referring to established and successful culturally safe smoking cessation services will be essential to the long term success of the program, particularly for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples for whom, despite impressive declines in smoking prevalence, smoking rates remain high.26

Access to a culturally safe LCSP is essential as is timely referral and access to health services for participants who require follow‐up after an LDCT scan. Access to navigators (culturally safe trained health care workers) to navigate specialist and hospital appointments to overcome structural barriers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants accessing mainstream services is needed to realise the benefits of early lung cancer detection.27,28 This navigation role could be extended more broadly across the lung cancer screening and assessment pathway and into the mainstream health system. Strategies to be codesigned with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and organisations to support the LCSP completion are summarised in Box 1.

A call to action: an equitable Australian lung cancer screening program is essential

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, organisations and people with lived experience of lung cancer must drive the design of an equitable LCSP including tailoring program promotion, workforce development, and program delivery to a range of contexts in which the program will be delivered. A commitment to culturally appropriate codesign processes will shape the development of an equitable lung cancer screening pathway. The key elements of an equitable LCSP for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples underpinned by the principles of codesign are outlined in Box 2.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations have the most to gain from an equitable approach to implementation and, conversely, the greater burden to bear if population‐specific implementation barriers are not identified and addressed as part of an LCSP. An equitable LCSP will ensure that potentially underscreened populations are able to participate through culturally safe and appropriate screening and service delivery models. Applying the principle of proportionate universalism, increasing services and resourcing in line with the gradient of health need,30 will be essential to achieving equity.

Box 1 – Strategies to support the completion of the lung cancer screening and assessment pathway


LCS = lung cancer screening; LCSP = Lung Cancer Screening Program; LDCT = low dose computed tomography.

Box 2 – Call to action for lung cancer screening (LCS)

Key elements of an equitable LCSP

Examples of how to achieve an equitable LCSP


An equitable LCS pathway is codesigned through a process that is guided at all stages by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership at all levels and from the range of diverse communities

Leadership such as:
  • Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation sector
  • Cancer Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cancer Control Leadership Group
  • Jurisdictional Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders and peak bodies
  • Community‐defined leaders, Elders and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders with lived experience engaging early to identify specific points in the pathway where adaptations are essential, such as:
    1. ‣ improved access through design and coordination of group community screening days
    2. ‣ promotional and communication strategies tailored by local leaders and organisations using locally accepted language, messaging and formats

Benefits of LCS are identified by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and not presumed by others

  • Benefits of LCS must be identified and valued by the target community; for example, being cancer‐free enables people to stay on country and participate in their life in meaningful ways

Lessons learned from existing cancer screening programs are incorporated

  • Promoting engagement through an alternative pathway for accessing bowel screening kits19
  • Promoting cultural safety while screening in the Beautiful Shawl project29 resulting from a partnership between BreastScreen Victoria, the Victorian Aboriginal Health Service and VACCHO

Implementation of LCS pathway for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is accountable to and overseen by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership

  • Indigenous status data mandated to be collected at screening and follow‐up to enable evaluation of equity
  • Governance mechanism established for review of LCSP equity
  • Principles of data sovereignty and formalised agreements for ownership and review of monitoring data are needed

LCSP = Lung Cancer Screening Program; VACCHO = Victorian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation.


Provenance: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Alison Brown1
  • Gail Garvey2
  • Nicole M Rankin1
  • Claire Nightingale1
  • Lisa J Whop3

  • 1 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD
  • 3 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT


Correspondence: alison.brown@unimelb.edu.au


Open access:

Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Melbourne, as part of the Wiley – The University of Melbourne agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.


Acknowledgements: 

Lisa Whop is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant (2009380). Gail Garvey is funded by an NHMRC Investigator Grant (1176651). Claire Nightingale is supported by a Mid‐Career Research Fellowship (MCRF21039) from the Victorian Government acting through the Victorian Cancer Agency. Nicole Rankin is funded by an NHMRC Ideas Grant (2019/GA65812) and a Medical Research Future Fund Grant (2019/MRF2008603). The funding sources had no role in the content of this article.

Competing interests:

We received funding from Cancer Australia for conducting consultations with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workforce around lung cancer screening but we were not directly funded for the publication of this article.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.