Connect
MJA
MJA

Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Victoria, 2006–18

Jane Oliver, Myra Hardy, Joshua Osowicki, Daniel Engelman, Andrew C Steer and Katherine Gibney
Med J Aust 2022; 216 (4): 201-202. || doi: 10.5694/mja2.51374
Published online: 17 January 2022

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and its antecedent acute rheumatic fever (ARF) cause preventable morbidity and early mortality in many disadvantaged communities; the incidence of ARF in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities is among the highest in the world.1 In Australia, ARF and RHD are notifiable except in the Australian Capital Territory, Tasmania, and Victoria,2 and their epidemiology is relatively unexplored in these jurisdictions.

We analysed routinely collected hospital admissions data for Victorian residents for whom ARF/RHD was the principal diagnosis (1 July 2006 – 30 June 2018) in the Victorian Admitted Episode Dataset (VAED), and death data for Victorian residents for whom ARF/RHD was the primary cause of death (1 July 2006 – 31 December 2017; later data not available) in the National Cause of Death Unit Record File. We estimated hospital admission and mortality rates (based on Australian Bureau of Statistics annual census data) and calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) using Poisson regression. As ARF is a disease of children and young adults,1 we confined our ARF analyses to people under 40 years of age. We report analyses of RHD admissions of Indigenous Australians both for those under 40 years of age and for all ages (further details: online Supporting Information). The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science Human Research Ethics Sub‐Committee approved our study (reference, 1852332).

During 2006–18, 107 people under 40 years of age were admitted to Victorian hospitals with ARF (146 admissions, 8–24/year; a further 103 admissions were of people over 40), and 5079 people with RHD (6758 admissions; 474–642/year); 1043 people died of RHD during 2006–17. The annual rate of admissions with ARF was 0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.3) per 100 000 population under 40 years of age; that of admissions with RHD was 9.9 (95% CI, 9.6–10) per 100 000 population (Box 1). The ARF admissions rate was highest for children aged 10–14 years (1.2 [95% CI, 0.9–1.5] per 100 000 population per year). Most admissions with RHD (5183, 77%) and most deaths attributed to RHD (961, 92%) were of people aged 60 years or more (Box 2; Supporting Information, table).

Among people under 40 years of age, the annual rate of admissions with ARF was higher for Indigenous (1.8 [95% CI, 0.8–3.6] per 100 000 population) than for non‐Indigenous people (0.4 [95% CI, 0.3–0.4] per 100 000; IRR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.4–10), as was that of admissions with RHD (4.1 [95% CI, 2.4–6.5] v 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0–1.2] per 100 000 population; IRR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.4–6.2) (Supporting Information, table).

In Victoria, RHD was less frequent in people under 40 years of age than in older people, but ARF and RHD were more frequent among Indigenous than non‐Indigenous people under 40. An earlier analysis (for the period 2015–17) found that the crude ARF/RHD hospital admission rates for Indigenous and non‐Indigenous Victorians were similar (7.8 v 10.8 per 100 000 population)3 — lower than the national rates (80.5 v 14.5 per 100 000 population), but similar to those for New South Wales (11.7 v 13.3 per 100 000 population)3 — but combining rates for both disorders and all ages may obscure differences. We did not have Victorian data for people from other ethnic groups with links to countries with high burdens of ARF/RHD, including New Zealand Māori and Pacific Islanders.4

The considerable morbidity and mortality caused by ARF and RHD could be reduced by regular treatment and monitoring.1 A patient register and control program for Victorians under 40 years of age would help achieve this aim, similar to New South Wales, where ARF and RHD are notifiable conditions and the burden is similar to that in Victoria. A register would improve patient management, better define disease epidemiology, and assist the evaluation of interventions. The differences in hospitalisation rates we found for younger people at risk of poor outcomes lends weight to considering a Victorian registry.

 

Box 1 – Hospital admissions of Victorian residents with acute rheumatic fever (ARF) or rheumatic heart disease (RHD) as principal diagnosis, annual rates, 1 July 2006 – 30 June 2018


 

 

Box 2 – Hospital admissions of Victorian residents with acute rheumatic fever (ARF) or rheumatic heart disease (RHD) as principal diagnosis, 1 July 2006 – 30 June 2018, mean annual rate by age group


 

Received 16 June 2021, accepted 15 November 2021

  • Jane Oliver1,2
  • Myra Hardy2
  • Joshua Osowicki2,3
  • Daniel Engelman2,3
  • Andrew C Steer2,3,4
  • Katherine Gibney1,5

  • 1 The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 4 Centre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
  • 5 Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC


Correspondence: jane.oliver@unimelb.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

Kate Francis (Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute) performed the analyses presented in the Supporting Information table. Ailish Learmonth (Deakin University) assisted with development of the Streptococcus A Diseases Data Linkage in Victoria study protocol and with the ethics approval application. We thank Kathleen Bapaume and Tom Liu at the Centre for Victorian Data Linkage, Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, for providing the linked data.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.