To the Editor: Thomas and colleagues1 describe the ethical complexities that can arise in the use of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on the detection of cell‐free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation to screen for chromosomal and other genetic fetal conditions, especially if the clinical utility and implications of the testing are not well understood and explained. They indicate that “the current NIPT tests available are for specific chromosomal aneuploidy, extended panels of targeted conditions and low resolution whole genome sequencing”.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Thomas J, Harraway J, Kirchhoffer D. Non‐invasive prenatal testing: clinical utility and ethical concerns about recent advances. Med J Aust 2021; 214: 168–170. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2021/214/4/non-invasive-prenatal-testing-clinical-utility-and-ethical-concerns-about-recent
- 2. Alshehri AA, Jackson DE. Non‐invasive prenatal fetal blood group genotype and its application in the management of hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Transfus Med Rev 2021; 35: 85–94.
- 3. van Hoeven LR, Berkowska MA, Verhagen OJ et al. Prediction of the anti‐RhD donor population size for managerial decision‐making. Vox Sang 2016; 111: 171–177.
No relevant disclosures.