Connect
MJA
MJA

POEM for achalasia: Looking good, but the final verses are yet to be penned

Ian JS Cook
Med J Aust 2021; 214 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/mja2.50945
Published online: 1 March 2021

Choice of therapy will be determined by the compromises and uncertainties most acceptable for the patient and their clinician

Achalasia is an uncommon oesophageal motor disorder (annual incidence in North America: 1.6 per 100 000 population1) of unknown aetiology. Its hallmarks are failure of peristalsis and failed deglutitive relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter, the result of the loss of inhibitory neurons in the oesophagus. Treatment for achalasia focuses on mechanical disruption of the integrity of the lower oesophageal sphincter, usually by laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) or endoscopic pneumatic dilatation (PD).2,3 The short term response rates for a third, novel option, per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), have been impressive since its introduction ten years ago.4 However, as achalasia is a chronic relapsing condition, treatment decisions must be based on long term outcomes (5‒10 years). The long term durability of POEM is unknown; more importantly, how the long term symptom relapse rate compares with the substantial rates following PD or LHM has not yet been established.


  • St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: I.Cook@unsw.edu.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Sadowski DC, Ackah F, Jiang B, Svenson LW. Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival. A population-based study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: e256–e261.
  • 2. Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1807–1816.
  • 3. Moonen A, Annese V, Belmans A, et al. Long-term results of the European achalasia trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Gut 2016; 65: 732–739.
  • 4. Inoue 2015. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221: 256–264.
  • 5. Gupta S, Sidhu M, Banh X, et al. A prospective multicentre study of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia in Australia. Med J Aust 2021; 214: 173–178.
  • 6. Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J, et al. Endoscopic or surgical myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2219–2229.
  • 7. Ponds FA, Fockens P, Lei A, et al. Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs pneumatic dilation on symptom severity and treatment outcomes among treatment-naive patients with achalasia. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 322: 134–144.
  • 8. Patel K, Abbassi-Ghadi N, Markar S, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29: 807–819.
  • 9. Richter JE, Boeckxstaens GE. Management of achalasia: surgery or pneumatic dilatation. Gut 2011; 60: 869–876.
  • 10. Zerbib F, Thetiot V, Richy F, et al. Repeated pneumatic dilations as long-term maintenance therapy for esophageal achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 692–697.
  • 11. Nijhuis RA, Prins LI, Mostafavi N, et al. factors associated with achalasia treatment outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1442–1453.
  • 12. Kumbhari V, Behary J, Szczesniak M, et al. Efficacy and safety of pneumatic dilatation for achalasia in the treatment of post-myotomy symptom relapse. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1076–1081.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.