A good report card, but there is room for improving care for patients with myocardial infarction

John K French
Med J Aust 2021; 214 (11): . || doi: 10.5694/mja2.51110
Published online: 21 June 2021

Improving systems of care can achieve earlier treatment and increase survival

The report by Nadlacki and colleagues1 on long term outcomes for patients after myocardial infarction provides much needed clarity about progress in care in Australia and New Zealand during 2009‒2015. The next step, well overdue, is a prospective, comprehensive registry based on the current universal definition of myocardial infarction,2 rather than on information derived from administrative data using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. The major advances in terms of technology, pharmacology, and patterns of care for people with myocardial infarction in Australia and New Zealand should not lead to complacency; improvements are still required, at both the systems and local levels, to achieve good quality care for all. For this we need outcomes data for unselected patients with myocardial infarction, as has been collected in New Zealand for almost a decade (ANZACS‐QI)3 and in Sweden for more than two decades (the SWEDEHEART registry).4

  • John K French1,2,3

  • 1 Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.