Connect
MJA
MJA

Predictors of inpatient rehabilitation after total knee replacement: an analysis of private hospital claims data

Frances Simmonds and John H Olver
Med J Aust 2019; 210 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja2.12067
Published online: 4 February 2019

To the Editor: Schilling and colleagues1 state that the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (AROC) — the national rehabilitation clinical quality registry for Australia and New Zealand — does not routinely collect data on post‐surgery outcomes for private total knee replacement (TKR) recipients. This statement is factually incorrect. All private inpatient rehabilitation services in Australia are members of AROC and routinely submit data (including functional outcomes as assessed by a functional independence measure) describing all episodes of rehabilitation they provide. More specifically, over the period described by Schilling and colleagues,1 AROC received data on outcomes for 93 278 TKRs receiving private rehabilitation. If we restrict the AROC data to match the study data (patients aged 40–89, single TKR, first admission), AROC received data describing 76 847 privately rehabilitated TKRs.


  • 1 Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW.
  • 2 Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC.


Correspondence: francess@uow.edu.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.