Selecting medical students: we need to assess more than academic excellence

Paul Garrud
Med J Aust 2018; 208 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.01224
Published online: 12 March 2018

Medical schools require selection processes that reflect the type of doctor they aim to produce

Selection for medical school is based on the applicant’s academic record, aptitude testing, and assessment of their personal attributes. The indicator of subsequent performance best supported by evidence is prior academic attainment,1,2 with the evidence coming mostly from exam performance at medical school and in postgraduate specialties. Rationales for employing further selection criteria have included alignment with professional body guidance,3 better discrimination between equally qualified applicants, and recognition that becoming a good doctor requires qualities beyond academic excellence.4 In light of current practice, which selection criteria are necessary (ie, provide a minimum required threshold) and which may be sufficient, singly or in combination, for selecting medical students?

  • University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom

Competing interests:

Paul Garrud chairs the Medical Schools Council Selection Alliance (United Kingdom). The views expressed in this editorial are personal and do not represent any formal position or policy of Medical Schools Council.

  • 1. McManus IC, Woolf K, Dacre J, et al. The academic backbone: longitudinal continuities in educational achievement from secondary school and medical school to MRCP (UK) and the specialist register in UK medical students and doctors. BMC Med 2013; 11: 242.
  • 2. Sladek RM, Bond MJ, Frost LK, et al. Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools. BMC Med Ed 2016; 16: 187.
  • 3. Australian Medical Council. Standards for assessment and accreditation of primary medical programs by the Australian Medical Council. 2012. (viewed Jan 2018).
  • 4. Medical Council of New Zealand. Good medical practice. Dec 2016. (viewed Dec 2017).
  • 5. Shulruf B, Bagg W, Begun M, et al. The efficacy of medical student selection tools in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust 2018; 208: 214-218.
  • 6. Papadakis M, Teherani A, Banach M, et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behaviour in medical school. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2673-2682.
  • 7. Powis D. Selecting medical students: an unresolved challenge. Med Teach 2015; 37: 252-260.
  • 8. Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand. Medical schools outcomes database: national data report 2017. (viewed Jan 2018).
  • 9. Yates J. Development of a “toolkit” to identify medical students at risk of failure to thrive on the course: an exploratory retrospective case study. BMC Med Ed 2011; 11: 95.
  • 10. Patel RS, Tarrant C, Bonas S, et al. Medical students’ personal experience of high-stakes failure: case studies using interpretative phenomenological analysis. BMC Med Ed 2015; 15: 86.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.