Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: focus on the data

Ezekiel Emanuel
Med J Aust 2017; 207 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00558
Published online: 20 November 2017

I acknowledge Parker’s letter on my article.1 First, there are considerable data showing that the public support for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is less well defined than the numbers cited by proponents. The support is very susceptible to the framing effect, that is, when the cases are described differently, support varies widely. Public support is highest for patients in pain — precisely those patients who do not want or use euthanasia. However, support drops below 50% when the cases involve patients who want euthanasia or PAS because of loss of dignity or autonomy or fear of being a burden2 — which are the reasons motivating most patients who request euthanasia or PAS. The proponents are the ones who manipulate the data, citing the strong public support statistics, but never acknowledging that this support is for the rare cases.

  • University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States


Competing interests:

I am a stock holder at Nuna, a venture partner at Oak HC/FT, a contributor at Fox News and a speaker at Leigh Bureau.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.