Identifying low-value care: the Royal Australasian College of Physicians’ EVOLVE initiative

Jason Soon, Rachelle Buchbinder, Jacqui Close, Catherine Hill, Simon Allan and Caroline Turnour
Med J Aust 2016; 204 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/mja15.01398
Published online: 21 March 2016

Challenges and lessons arising from early adoption of a new approach towards determining what is good clinical practice

In March 2015, 41 medical specialties of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) came together as part of the College’s EVOLVE initiative. The main aim of EVOLVE is to drive safer, higher-quality patient care through identifying and reducing low-value medical practices.1 In EVOLVE, “low-value” practices are defined as tests, procedures or interventions that are overused, inappropriate or of limited effectiveness (and, in extreme cases, potentially harmful). The name of the initiative reflects the dynamic and evolving nature of evidence-based medicine. EVOLVE is modelled on the Choosing Wisely initiative in the United States and similar initiatives underway in Canada, Italy and the United Kingdom.2

  • 1 Policy and Advocacy, Royal Australasian College of Physicians, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 Falls and Injury Prevention Group, Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
  • 4 Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA
  • 5 Palliative Care, Arohanui Hospice, Palmerston North, New Zealand


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Royal Australasian College of Physicians. EVOLVE: evaluating evidence. enhancing efficiencies. (accessed Feb 2016).
  • 2. Levinson W, Kallewaard M, Bhatia RS, et al. ‘Choosing Wisely’: a growing international campaign. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24:167-174.
  • 3. Morden NE, Colla CH, Sequist TD, Rosenthal MB. Choosing Wisely – the politics and economics of labeling low-value services. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 589-592.
  • 4. Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 401-409.
  • 5. Grady D, Redberg RF, Mallon WK. How should top-five lists be developed?: what is the next step? JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 498-499.
  • 6. Rosenberg A, Agiro A, Gottlieb M, et al. Early trends among seven recommendations from the Choosing Wisely Campaign. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175: 1913-1920.
  • 7. Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Review. Obsolete MBS items – Tranche #1. December 2015. (accessed Feb 2016).
  • 8. Scott I, Duckett S. In search of professional consensus in defining and reducing low-value care. Med J Aust 2015; 203: 179-181. <MJA full text>


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.