Surveyors' perceptions of the impact of accreditation on patient safety in general practice
Author: Anish M Philip
Published online: 2 March 2015
To the Editor: Finally! Abou Elnour and colleagues have done something different and looked at accreditation in general practice from the perspective of the surveyors.1 Previous studies have solely focused on accreditation as a process and how it improves patient safety in the acute health care setting.2
Sure, the sample size was meagre, with only 10 Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited surveyors taking part, but between them, they had accredited 2022 general practices over 15 years.1 As a health care consumer, I was horrified to discover that only 80% of Australian general practices have opted to become accredited.3 This is especially disturbing when “errors and harms” have been well documented in general practices1,4 and we know that the accreditation process improves patient safety.1,2
Abou Elnour et al highlighted that clinical risk management of patient safety is poorly done throughout general practices in Australia.1 It was alarming to realise that my first port of call when unwell may not have a process or structure to effectively manage any adverse events that may occur.3 I agree with the surveyors that it is time for the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives (APCC) Program, which has been successful in improving quality,5 to broaden its horizons and implement a clinical risk management system in general practices. I support Abou Elnour et al's recommendation for the APCC Program to add patient safety to its agenda.
Additionally, I think it is time for the accreditation process to be mandated among all general practices, to ensure a high level of patient safety. If those 2022 practices had not undergone accreditation, we would not be having this much-needed discussion about improving patient safety in a setting where it is underestimated.1 Patients go to general practices when they are vulnerable and need help the most. We need to maintain general practice's reputation by providing excellent patient care.
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
References
- Abou Elnour A, Hernan AL, Ford D, et al. Surveyors' perception of the impact of accreditation on patient safety in general practice. Med J Aust 2014; 201 (3 Suppl): S56-S59. 1
- Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20: 172-183. 2
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Standards for general practices. 4th ed. Melbourne: RACGP, 2010. http://www.racgp.org.au/your-practice/standards/standards4thedition (accessed May 2014).
- Makeham MAB, Kidd MR, Saltman DC, et al. The Threats to Australian Patient Safety (TAPS) study: incidence of reported errors in general practice. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 95-98. 4
- Ford DR, Knight AW. The Australian Primary Care Collaboratives: an Australian general practice success story. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 90-91. 5