Letters
Indigenous health Health services administration
Volume 201 - Issue 8

The cost-effectiveness of primary care for Indigenous Australians with diabetes living in remote Northern Territory communities

Authors:  David J Whyatt, Alistair Vickery and Matthew Yap

Med J Aust 2014; 201 (8): 448-450. || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00843
Published online: 20 October 2014
For a realistic analysis, all primary care use and all known associations must be taken into account
Download PDF (163 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

To the Editor: Thomas and colleagues1 attribute differences in hospital use among patients with diabetes to differences in use of primary care at remote state-run primary care clinics. We believe this conclusion to be unsupported by the evidence presented.

First, the study fails to accurately measure primary care use. Although study participants were restricted to those with remote residences, this ignores the mobility of such a population, and their subsequent access to primary care services not captured by the remote clinics' primary care information system. Additionally, there are 26 Aboriginal community controlled health services, many of which have primary or satellite locations in remote areas.

Second, there are other known associations, unadjusted for in this study, that may explain differing hospitalisation rates in low and high users of the remote clinics. These include social acceptability,2 socioeconomics,3 behaviour of health care providers and patients4 and access to health services. It is known that access to hospital drives hospital use.5 Differences in social norms between the two groups may drive different choices in site of health care delivery. Stigmatised health problems of a social or spiritual nature may affect a patient's willingness to see health workers from within their community.

Without adjusting for these variables, differences in hospital use cannot be simply attributed to differences in the use of (some) primary care services. Without such attribution, no realistic cost-effectiveness analysis can be undertaken. This study should not be used to guide policy or planning.

Authors

  • David J Whyatt1
  • Alistair Vickery1
  • Matthew Yap1
  • 1. School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA.

Correspondence: david.whyatt@uwa.edu.au

Competing interests

No relevant disclosures.

Acknowledgements

David Whyatt and Matthew Yap's positions at the University of Western Australia are funded by the Department of Health, Western Australia.

References

View this article on Wiley Online Library

More like this

Indigenous health Perspective 1 September 2026 Open Access

Forty Years in the Making: Reporting on the Co-Creation of a National Roadmap for Birthing on Country Services for the Best Start to Life

Res McCalman, Anneka J. Bowman, Roianne West, Kristie Watego, Jyai Allen, Claire Clack, Sue Kildea, Sue Kruske, Melanie Briggs, Cleone Wellington, Rebecca Coddington, Yu Gao, Isabella Garti, Sascha Kowalenko, Sarah Ireland, Catherine Austin, John D. Boffa, Marah Prior, Kelsie Kahl, Bettina Chaseling, Sarah Khaw, Emily Armstrong, Donna Hartz, Yvette Roe

Indigenous health Research 13 August 2026 Open Access

Watchful Waiting Compared With Immediate Antibiotics for Urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children With Uncomplicated Acute Otitis Media (WATCH): A Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial

Jennifer S. Reath, Hasantha Gunasekera, Sanja Lujic, Amanda J. Leach, Letitia Campbell, Robyn Walsh, Tim Usherwood, Geoffrey K. Spurling, Claudette A. Tyson, Deborah A. Askew, Kelvin Kong, Chelsea J. Watego, Peter Morris, Wendy Hu, Penelope A. Abbott

View more