Abortion and breast cancer risk for Australian women
Authors: Kelly-Anne Phillips, Fiona J Bruinsma and Roger L Milne
Published online: 6 October 2014
To the Editor: Recent comments in the media have renewed attention on the question of whether abortion is a risk factor for breast cancer, despite broad acceptance internationally in the scientific, medical and cancer advocacy communities that there is no association.
It was demonstrated in 2004 that abortion is not a risk factor for breast cancer, based on a combined analysis of prospective cohort study data from around the world.1 The authors showed empirically that retrospective case–control studies tend to give biased findings, most likely because women with breast cancer (cases) are more likely than controls to report previous abortions. Prospective cohort studies avoid this bias because information on abortions is collected before any of the women develop the disease. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis of findings from studies of Chinese women reported an apparent increased breast cancer risk associated with abortion based on case–control studies, but no evidence of association based on prospective cohort studies.2 Several other large prospective cohort studies have published consistently null results since 2004.3,4
In 1990–1994, the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study5 recruited 24 018 Victorian women aged 40–69 years who were free of breast cancer, and collected information on risk factors, including all pregnancies. The questionnaire did not differentiate between spontaneous and induced abortions. Using record linkage with the Victorian Cancer Registry, we determined that 1235 of these women were subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer, up to 30 December 2012. We assessed associations prospectively using Cox regression, with age as the time variable, considered from recruitment to breast cancer diagnosis, and censored at death, permanent departure from Victoria or 30 December 2012. Analyses were adjusted for country, year of birth and socioeconomic status.
Ever having had an abortion in the first trimester was not associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.94–1.20). The result was similar after additional adjustment for age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, number of full-term pregnancies, age at first birth and lifetime breastfeeding (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94–1.22). The result was also similar for abortion before first full-term pregnancy (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81–1.16) and for abortion in the first two trimesters (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92–1.17).
Consistent with international research findings, abortion is not associated with risk of breast cancer for Australian women.
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
Acknowledgements
Recruitment for the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study was funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria; the study was further supported by National Health and Medical Research Council grants 209057 and 251553 and by infrastructure provided by Cancer Council Victoria. Kelly-Anne Phillips is a National Breast Cancer Foundation Fellow.
References
- Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, et al. Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83 000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 2004; 363: 1007-1016. _ENREF_1
- Huang Y, Zhang X, Li W, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Causes Control 2014; 25: 227-236. 2
- Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, Reynolds P, et al. Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study. Contraception 2008; 77: 391-396. 3
- Michels KB, Xue F, Colditz GA, Willet WC. Induced and spontaneous abortion and incidence of breast cancer among young women: a prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 814-820. 4
- Giles GG, English DR. The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. IARC Sci Publ 2002; 156: 69-70. lefthere
Forty Years in the Making: Reporting on the Co-Creation of a National Roadmap for Birthing on Country Services for the Best Start to Life
Res McCalman, Anneka J. Bowman, Roianne West, Kristie Watego, Jyai Allen, Claire Clack, Sue Kildea, Sue Kruske, Melanie Briggs, Cleone Wellington, Rebecca Coddington, Yu Gao, Isabella Garti, Sascha Kowalenko, Sarah Ireland, Catherine Austin, John D. Boffa, Marah Prior, Kelsie Kahl, Bettina Chaseling, Sarah Khaw, Emily Armstrong, Donna Hartz, Yvette Roe
Temporal Trends in Preterm Birth Associated With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Victoria, Australia: A Population-Based Interrupted Time-Series Study
Melvin Marzan, Heng Jiang, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Joanne M. Said, Lisa Hui
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Liz Sutton, Harsha Ananthram, Rebecca Matthews
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Bashi Kumar-Hazard, Andrew M. Bisits, Sharon L. Settecasse, Jenny Gamble, Hazel Keedle, Hannah G. Dahlen
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Wendy Pollock, Alissa Fleming, Ensieh Fooladi, Joy Kloester, Anne Tremayne, Yasmin Zisin, Bethany Carr, Kym Davey, Suzanne Willey, Jenny Gamble
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane