Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students

Mavourneen Casey and Diann S Eley
Med J Aust 2014; 201 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00660
Published online: 4 August 2014

In reply: We thank Behrendorff and Liu for their interest in our paper and their insightful comments. We acknowledge the validity of their argument that gender bias may be associated with a decrease in the number of direct-entry, or domestic, graduate places offered at the University of Queensland (UQ) School of Medicine. However, we would counter that the change in numbers across the two domestic entry pathways is another contributing factor, rather than an alternative hypothesis. In our article we point out that the change in gender ratio was associated with the removal of the interview, not that it was caused by the removal of the interview. As with graduate medical student performance in general,1 there are likely to be a number of interacting factors underlying the change in gender proportions at UQ. For example, the possibility of changing characteristics within the GAMSAT candidate pool is worthy of exploration. Further research is underway to help identify the factors related to the gender differences in GAMSAT performance as well as the underlying causes.

  • Mavourneen Casey
  • Diann S Eley

  • School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.