Connect
MJA
MJA

Legal perspectives on consent in disputes about futile care

Cameron L Stewart
Med J Aust 2013; 198 (4): 225-226. || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10789
Published online: 4 March 2013

Futility disputes highlight some important legal principles concerning the right to refuse treatment, advance directives and the role of substitute decisionmakers

The need for legal resolution of futility disputes is a rare occurrence in Australia and the jurisprudence is still emerging.1 The legal approach to futility disputes differs in each state jurisdiction, and a full analysis of the Australian law is beyond the scope of this article. Most recent discussions have focused on the law in Queensland and New South Wales,2,3 so for this hypothetical I will outline the relevant South Australian law, given the SA connections of the other authors of this set of articles.4,5 However, this discussion has clear relevance to other jurisdictions in Australia.

  • Cameron L Stewart

  • Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School, Sydney, NSW.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.