Single-centre experience of donation after cardiac death

Judith R Kennedy and Michael C Kennedy
Med J Aust 2013; 198 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja12.11278
Published online: 4 February 2013

To the Editor: The donation after cardiac death (DCD) procedure used by Coulson and colleagues1 is ethically problematic and is not, as claimed, re-implementation of the practice followed before brain-death organ donation protocols were introduced. First reported in 1992, the more precise term is controlled donation after cardiac death or controlled non-heart-beating organ donation.2 What is controlled is the timing, mode and criteria of death, and its location (operating theatres). The threshold medical decision is to remove life-support and allow the patient to die. The aim of the procedure is to seize the opportunity to procure a particular kind of death within a particular time frame for organ transplant purposes. The procedure fails if the patient survives past the point for organ viability (usually 60 minutes).

  • Judith R Kennedy
  • Michael C Kennedy

  • Sydney, NSW.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.