The 2011 report of the Productivity Commission (PC) recommended the establishment of a no-fault national injury insurance scheme limited to “catastrophic” injury, including medical injury. The report is welcome, but represents a missed opportunity to establish simultaneously a much-needed no-fault scheme for all medical injuries.
The existing indemnity scheme based on negligence remains a slow, costly, inefficient, ill targeted and stress-creating system.
A fault-based negligence scheme cannot deter non-intentional errors and does little to identify or prevent systems failures. In addition, it discourages reporting, and thus is antithetical to the modern focus on universal patient safety.
A no-fault scheme has the potential to be fairer, quicker and no more costly, and to contribute to patient safety.
No-fault schemes have been in place in at least six developed countries for many years. This extensive experience in comparable countries should be examined to assist Australia to design an effective, comprehensive system.
Before implementing the recommendations of the PC, the federal government should ask the Commission to study and promptly report on an ancillary no-fault scheme that covers all medical injury.
- 1. Productivity Commission. Disability care and support. Report No. 54. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2011. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/disability-support/report (accessed Jun 2012).
- 2. Report of the National Committee of Inquiry. Compensation and rehabilitation in Australia. [The Woodhouse Report.] Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1974.
- 3. Commonwealth Treasury. Review of the law of negligence — final report. [The Ipp Report.] Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2002. http://www.revofneg.treasury.gov.au/content/review2.asp (accessed Jun 2012).
- 4. Nash L, Daly M, Johnson M, et al. Psychological morbidity in Australian doctors who have and have not experienced a medico-legal matter: a cross-sectional survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2007; 41: 917-925.
- 5. Kachalia AB, Mello MM, Brennan TA, Studdert DM. Beyond negligence: avoidability and medical injury compensation. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66: 387-402.
- 6. Merry A, McCall Smith A. Errors, medicine and the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
- 7. Nash LM, Walton MM, Daly MG, et al. Perceived practice change in Australian doctors as a result of medicolegal concerns. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 579-583. <MJA full text>
- 8. Studdert DM, Brennan TA. No-fault compensation for medical injuries: the prospect for error prevention. JAMA 2001; 286: 217-223.
- 9. Mikkonen M. Prevention of patient injuries: the Finnish patient insurance scheme. Med Law 2004; 23: 251-257.
- 10. Hugh TB, Tracy GD. Hindsight bias in medicolegal expert reports. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 277-278. <MJA full text>
- 11. Elkin KJ, Spittal MJ, Elkin DJ, Studdert DM. Doctors disciplined for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2009. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 452-456. <MJA full text>
- 12. Nau JY. No-fault compensation in France. Lancet 1994; 344: 676.
- 13. Clinton HR, Obama B. Making patient safety the centerpiece of medical liability reform. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2205-2208.
- 14. Madden R. Submission to the Productivity Commission. [Submission No. 466.] Disability care and support. Report No. 54. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/disability-support/submissions (accessed Jun 2012).
- 15. Medical Indemnity Protection Society Ltd. Submission to the Productivity Commission. [Submission No. 282.] Disability care and support. Report No. 54. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/disability-support/submissions (accessed Jun 2012).
- 16. Pukk-Härenstam K, Ask J, Brommels M, et al. Analysis of 23 364 patient-generated, physician-reviewed malpractice claims from a non-tort, blame-free, national patient insurance system: lessons learned from Sweden. Postgrad Med J 2009; 85: 69-73.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.