Malpractice litigation is now a substantial cost in the provision of healthcare.
Despite new attitudes of Australian courts towards medical evidence, expert reports remain the cornerstone of most medical negligence cases.
There is evidence that hindsight bias, which may cause the expert to simplify, trivialise and criticise retrospectively the decisions of the treating doctor, is inevitable when the expert knows there has been an adverse outcome.
If possible, outcome information should be withheld from experts providing reports. If outcome information is not withheld, courts should be made aware of the probability of hindsight bias.
- 1. Edwards W. How to make good decisions. Acta Psychologica 1984; 56: 5-27.
- 2. Malpas J. Negligence lawyers feel the squeeze. The Times London 2001; 22 May.
- 3. Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479.
- 4. Baron J, Hershey JC. Outcome bias in decision evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54: 569-579.
- 5. Berlin L. Malpractice issues in radiology — hindsight bias. Am J Radiol 2000; 175: 597-601.
- 6. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Cheney FW. Effect of outcome on physician judgements of appropriateness of care. JAMA 1991; 265: 1957-1960.
- 7. Cook RI, Woods DD. Operating at the sharp end: the complexity of human error. In: Bogner MS, editor. Human error in medicine. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlham, 1994; 255-310.
- 8. Fischoff B. Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. J Exp Psychol 1975; 1: 288-299.
- 9. Brook RH, Appel FA. Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review. N Engl J Med 1973; 288: 1323-1329.
- 10. Kamin KA, Rachlinski JJ. Determining liability in hindsight. Law Hum Behav 1995; 19: 89-104.
- 11. LaBine SJ, LaBine G. Determinations of negligence and the hindsight bias. Law Hum Behav 1996; 20: 501-516.
- 12. Seltsan Pty Ltd v McGuiness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262.
- 13. Chassin MR, Kosecoff J, Park RE, et al. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services ? A study of three procedures. JAMA 1987; 258: 2533-2537.
- 14. Winslow CM, Solomon DH, Chassin MR, et al. The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 721-727.
- 15. DeKeyser V, Woods DD. Fixation errors: failures to revise situation assessment in dynamic and risky systems. In: Colombo AG, Saiz de Bustamante A, editors. System reliability assessment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1990; 231-251.
- 16. Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Sect. 36.13CA.
- 17. Freckelton I, Reddy P, Selby H. Australian judicial perspectives on expert evidence: an empirical study. Carlton, Vic: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Inc, 1999; 1-13.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.