Medicine and science must oppose intolerance and censorship

Paul A Komesaroff, Amber Moore and Ian H Kerridge
Med J Aust 2012; 197 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10500
Published online: 16 July 2012

Friends of Science in Medicine should avoid threatening their own values

Science has always been — and should be — a battleground for contending views on what is true. Because of the close connection between knowledge and power, however, the risk is always present that those who command the dominant theories or ideologies will rely on their positions of influence to overcome those who oppose them. It is important that those who treasure tolerance and the value of open, unfettered discourse remain sensitive to these risks and — even when they personally disagree — to protect and foster the expression of contrary viewpoints.

  • 1 Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 2 Three Lanterns, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 3 Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
  • 4 Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. MacLennan AH, Morrison RG. Tertiary education institutions should not offer pseudoscientific medical courses [editorial]. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 225-226. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Bevanger L. UK universities drop alternative medicine degree programs. Deutsche Welle [internet] 2012; Jan 18.,15673133,00.html (accessed Mar 2012).
  • 3. Lakatos I. Proofs and refutations: the logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
  • 4. Komesaroff PA. Objectivity, science and society: interpreting nature and society in the age of the crisis of science. New York: Routledge, 2008 [1986].
  • 5. Feyerabend P. Against method: outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books, 1975.
  • 6. Ernst E, Pittler MH, Stevinson C, White A, editors. The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine: an evidence-based approach. London: Mosby, 2001.
  • 7. Myers SP, Xue CC, Cohen MM, et al. The legitimacy of academic complementary medicine [editorial]. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 69-70. <MJA full text>
  • 8. Miles A, Loughlin M, Polychronis A. Evidence-based healthcare, clinical knowledge and the rise of personalised medicine. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14: 621-649.
  • 9. Komesaroff PA. Experiments in love and death: medicine, postmodernism, microethics and the body. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2008.
  • 10. Djulbegovic B, Morris L, Lyman GH. Evidentiary challenges to evidence-based medicine. J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 6: 99-109.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.