Connect
MJA
MJA

Tertiary education institutions should not offer pseudoscientific medical courses

Alastair H MacLennan and Robert G B Morrison
Med J Aust 2012; 196 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10128
Published online: 5 March 2012

Standing up for science

The international scientific credibility of Australian tertiary education institutions is being undermined by the increasing number of pseudoscientific health courses that they offer (Box).1,2 Many universities teach therapies without a scientific basis to their students within their health care curricula, including homeopathy, iridology, reflexology, kinesiology, healing touch therapy, aromatherapy and “energy medicine”. Subjects such as acupuncture and chiropractic are claimed to treat a broad array of afflictions and are taught as such. The levels of evidence supporting these alternative beliefs are weak at best, and such randomised controlled trials of these therapies as exist mostly do not support their efficacy (with the exception of acupuncture for some types of pain).3-5 Some university courses purport to teach critical thinking about these approaches and promote research into them. Both are appropriate objectives if they are not a subterfuge for awarding qualifications to practise these therapies.


  • 1 Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.
  • 2 School of Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.



Competing interests:

We are founding members of FSM. Alastair MacLennan has won the South Australian Government Science Excellence Award — Research for Public Good. Robert Morrison has won the Australian Government Eureka Prize for the Promotion of Science.

  • 1. Mendham T. Degrees of woo. The Skeptic 2011; 31: 20-25. http://www.skeptics.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/University-pseudoscience-Pt-1.pdf (accessed Jan 2012).
  • 2. Mendham T. The curiosity shock. The Skeptic 2011; 32: 36-45. http://www. skeptics.com.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/University-pseudo science-Pt-2.pdf (accessed Jan 2012).
  • 3. Singh S, Ernst E. Trick or treatment: the undeniable facts about alternative medicine. New York: WW Norton, 2008.
  • 4. Hensley MJ, Gibson PG. Promoting evidence-based alternative medicine. All therapies orthodox or alternative require high quality clinical trials. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 573-574. <MJA full text>
  • 5. Hunt K, Ernst E. The evidence-base for complementary medicine in children: a critical overview of systematic reviews. Arch Dis Child 2011; 96: 769-776.
  • 6. Kremer RG, Duenas R, McGuckin B. Defining primary care and the chiropractic physicians’ role in the evolving health care system. J Chiropr Med 2002; 1: 3-8.
  • 7. Mirtz TA, Morgan L, Wyatt LH, Greene L. An epidemiological examination of the subluxation construct using Hill’s criteria of causation. Chiropr Osteopat 2009; 17: 13.
  • 8. Campbell JB, Busse JW, Injeyan HS. Chiropractors and vaccination: a historical perspective. Pediatrics 2000; 105: e45.
  • 9. Colquhoun D. Science degrees without science. Nature 2007; 446: 373-374.
  • 10. Bevanger L. UK universities drop alternative medicine degree programs. Deutsche Welle. http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,15673133,00.html (accessed Jan 2012).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.