MJA
MJA InSight
MJA Careers
Editorials

Is laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer the way to the future?

Ned S Abraham
Med J Aust 2011; 194 (9): 441-442.

Upcoming large studies may shed light on why this technique was not rapidly widely adopted like certain other laparoscopically assisted procedures

Ned S Abraham, MMed, FRACS, PhD, Associate Professor of Surgery
Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales (Coffs Harbour Campus), Coffs Harbour, NSW.
Article References: 
Reference Text: 
Thompson BS, Coory MD, Lumley JW. National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, 2000–2008. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 000-000.
Reference Order: 
1
PubMed ID: 
Reference Text: 
Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg 2008; 143: 832-839; discussion 839-840.
Reference Order: 
2
PubMed ID: 
18794419
Reference Text: 
Steele SR, Brown TA, Rush RM, et al. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 583-591.
Reference Order: 
3
PubMed ID: 
17846852
Reference Text: 
Kemp JA, Finlayson SR. Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1181-1187.
Reference Order: 
4
PubMed ID: 
18246394
Reference Text: 
Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, et al. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 819-824.
Reference Order: 
5
PubMed ID: 
18438119
Reference Text: 
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-2059.
Reference Order: 
6
PubMed ID: 
15141043
Reference Text: 
Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R, et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 291-307.
Reference Order: 
7
PubMed ID: 
17254934
Reference Text: 
Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (3): CD003145.
Reference Order: 
8
PubMed ID: 
16034888
Reference Text: 
Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 728-738.
Reference Order: 
9
PubMed ID: 
18948799
Reference Text: 
Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, et al. Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study shows that elderly patients may benefit from lower postoperative complication rates following laparoscopic versus open resection. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 86-91.
Reference Order: 
10
PubMed ID: 
19937975
Reference Text: 
Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1111-1124.
Reference Order: 
11
PubMed ID: 
15449261
Reference Text: 
Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 508-516.
Reference Order: 
12
PubMed ID: 
17610681
Reference Text: 
Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 480-486; discussion 486-487.
Reference Order: 
13
PubMed ID: 
7736878
Reference Text: 
Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1: 144-150.
Reference Order: 
14
PubMed ID: 
1688289
Reference Text: 
Terblanche J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a new milestone or a dangerous innovation? HPB Surgery 1991; 3: 177-180.
Reference Order: 
15
PubMed ID: 
1828365
Reference Text: 
Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the new “gold standard”? Arch Surg 1992; 127: 917-923.
Reference Order: 
16
PubMed ID: 
1386505
Reference Text: 
Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 227-230.
Reference Order: 
17
PubMed ID: 
10100792
Reference Text: 
Vlug MS, Wind J, van der Zaag E, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 335-343.
Reference Order: 
18
PubMed ID: 
18727715
Reference Text: 
Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, et al. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a metaanalysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 1119-1131.
Reference Order: 
19
PubMed ID: 
19415308
Reference Text: 
Abraham N, Albayati S. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs hasten recovery after colorectal resections. World J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 3: 1-6.
Reference Order: 
20
PubMed ID: 
21286218
Reference Text: 
World Health Organization. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal. Australian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG). A La CaRT: Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial A phase III prospective randomised trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted resection versus open resection for rectal cancer. http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/trial.aspx?trialid=ACTRN12609000663257 (accessed Apr 2011).
Reference Order: 
21
PubMed ID: 
Reference Text: 
Wind J, Hofland J, Preckel B, et al. Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg 2006; 6: 16.
Reference Order: 
22
PubMed ID: 
17134506

The full contents of this page are only available to subscribers.