Volume 193 - Issue 11

Osler and his Australian associations — part 2: continuing influence

Author:  Milton G Roxanas

Med J Aust 2010; 193 (11): 690-693. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb04106.x
Published online: 6 December 2010

“I would like an arrangement made with publishing houses in India and Australia to issue special editions of my text-book in those countries ... I have so many friends in both places, many of them men in official and teaching positions that the book would be adopted in the schools — as indeed it has been at Sydney ...”

The first part of this article examined the life and medical influences of William Osler (Box 1) in the context of his Australian connections. This second part looks at his encounters with Australians in the final years of his life, and the influence and legacy he left on Australian practitioners and medical practice after his death.

In 1918, the Oslers were still grieving the loss of their son Revere in the war the previous year. This catalysed Osler’s decision to bequeath his house to “Christ Church [College, Oxford] as a permanent home for my successors”, in the absence of any progeny.1

On 24 March 1918, Lady Osler wrote to Kate Cushing (Harvey Cushing’s wife):

This implies that when Piero F B Fiaschi (Box 2) worked with Harvey Cushing in Baltimore in the United States, he was introduced to William Osler and that he continued the friendship and visits after Osler went to Oxford.2,4

As the tide of war was turning in 1918, Osler was lecturing Canadian and American medical officers on postgraduate medical courses and preparing them for life after the war. In October of that year, Hugh Cairns (Box 3), an Australian from Adelaide, was introduced to Osler by A L Smith, the master of Balliol College, Oxford. Osler offered Cairns an appointment at the Radcliffe Infirmary for 6 months when he was discharged from the army, and then advised him to work for a Bachelor of Science in surgical pathology at Oxford, and subsequently to prepare for obtaining Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons.5 Cairns was a frequent visitor at the Oslers’ house, the “Open Arms”, and on 25 January 1919 was introduced to Harvey Cushing. Cairns attended Osler’s Saturday morning rounds at the Radcliffe Infirmary, which continued until Osler became ill with bronchopneumonia in December. Osler then developed empyema and died on 29 December 1919, at the age of 70 years.

Cairns continued to visit Lady Osler, and she recommended him to Cushing for neurosurgical training. During 1926–1927, Cairns spent 12 months with Cushing at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston. On his return to London in September 1927, Cairns set up the neurosurgical unit at the London Hospital and was instrumental in persuading Lord Nuffield (who was previously Osler’s car mechanic) to donate money to establish Nuffield chairs at Oxford University. Cairns played a major role in setting up mobile neurosurgical units in World War II,6 and was involved in the early trials of streptomycin and penicillin in treating cerebral infections. He became the first Nuffield Professor of Surgery at Oxford.

Cushing’s biography of Osler was published in 1925, and Robert Scot Skirving (Box 4), a senior physician, was chosen to review it.8 After a delightfully thorough review, he ended by quoting a description of Osler from the biography: “He joyed with the joys and wept with the sorrows of the humblest of those who were proud to be his pupils”. Scot Skirving took it upon himself to write a short publication on the life of Osler for the Australian market.9 He praised Osler’s textbook, The principles and practice of medicine, as “absolutely sane, without faddism and with a perfect blending of scientific facts with their practical applications ...” His work was not without error however — for he writes that Osler died at 71 instead of 70 years.

A physical connection between Osler and Australia exists in the form of a gavel (Box 5) that was donated to the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in March 1950 by Dr William C Gibson, a Canadian neuroscientist who worked with neurophysiologist John C Eccles in Australia and who had a notice on his office door that said, “If you think medical research is expensive, try disease”.10 This gavel is made from wood saved from Osler’s childhood home, the parsonage at Bond Head, Ontario, Canada. The history of similar gavels has been described and catalogued — it appears that Osler’s nephew, Dr Norman Gwyn, used wood from the Osler home to make paper knives for the family and gavels that he gave to various associations (although the one in the possession of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians is not mentioned).11

Osler’s approach to the practice of medicine was a balanced one, between the bedside clinical, the laboratory, and postmortem pathology. He bought microscopes for his students, performed postmortem examinations himself and was careful with therapeutics. He used to remind his readers of a sensible approach to pathological tests and their importance to the clinical situation. In an editorial accompanying a “Clinching the diagnosis” series in Pathology that posed the question, “what would Osler say today?”,13 James P Isbister (Box 6) concluded by writing, “In the Oslerian sense, it [the series of articles] will be a collection of problem-oriented reviews aimed at bridging the gap between clinical and laboratory medicine”. Written from the pathologist’s point of view, Isbister discussed the various approaches to interpreting pathology results, weighing possibilities and relating them to the clinical picture rather than viewing them in isolation — wise counsel at a time when doctors often spent more time looking at results than talking with the patient.

In 1996, Dr Oleg Preda (Box 7) privately printed 500 copies of his book The master-word of Dr William Osler.14 In the preface, he writes:

Preda edited many of Osler’s speeches, giving them modern, relevant titles, removing gender-specific language, and adding notes to abide with Osler’s wishes (eg, Osler’s handwritten request on his copy of A way of life to add a Sanskrit poem by the Indian dramatist Kalidasa to any future reprints of the address). He divided the book into a brief history of Osler’s life followed by four sections based on the principles by which he practised medicine and lived his life: (1) “Credo” contained his beliefs and philosophy; (2) “Study” referred to students, libraries and bedside reading; (3) “Work” outlined the need “to do what lies clearly at hand”, and relations among colleagues and nurses; and (4) “History” aimed to connect the past with the present. In this technological era of medicine, Preda’s book added humanity and philosophy to the technical aspects of medicine, and he was modest in printing a small number of copies at his own expense and giving these to friends instead of making them available to a wider audience of doctors and students.

In 1999, Professor Michael O’Rourke (Box 8) wrote an editorial in the Medical Journal of Australia titled “William Osler: a model for the 21st century?”.15 The publication mentioned various aspects of Osler’s life and stressed his attitude to medicine, especially his enthusiasm, knowledge and ethics. Osler’s rejection of gossip endeared him to friends and foes, which helped unite the medical profession. O’Rourke referred to notes inside a copy of Cushing’s The life of Sir William Osler (held in the library of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians) in which Robert Scot Skirving wrote that James Linklater Isbister (Box 9) had met Osler twice and that “he [Isbister] was extremely impressed by his character and influence on the young”. O’Rourke reminded us that, “given the explosion of knowledge and the frequent intrusions from phone, facsimiles and email which frustrate our routine and challenge our equanimity”, we need to sit back, reflect and weigh knowledge, commonsense and ethics in our daily practice, as Osler taught and practised.

A recently found letter from Osler to D Appleton & Co, publisher of The principles and practice of medicine, dated 18 February 1898, stated:

This led to the eventual release, in 1913, of a special eighth edition of his textbook for Australia, which was used in Australian universities.17 At that time there were three medical schools in Australia (Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide), with a total enrolment of 957 medical students, while the number of doctors in the country was less than 3000. These numbers were sufficient for Butterworth & Co to publish a special Australian edition made up of American sheets.17 Unfortunately, Osler did not identify who his Australian friends were. Osler was keen for his book to have as wide a market as possible, as he used royalties from its sale to further his own book collecting.

Osler’s influence on Australia was similar to that on other countries. The Australian edition of his textbook taught the principles of medicine to a generation of doctors. Those fortunate enough to visit or meet him took pride in the experience and were inspired to practise medicine with high ideals and humanity. His writings and timeless sayings (eg, “take heed to [your] education, and [your] reputation will take care of itself”) are often quoted because they have well articulated wisdom, even in this age of molecular medicine. His cautious attitude to medication (“man has an inborn craving for medicine”) is a constant warning to those practising polypharmacy. He also highlighted the need for continuing medical education by stating “it is astonishing with how little reading a doctor can practice medicine, but it is not astonishing how badly he may do it”. The employment of modern tests, be they chemical, imaging or pathological, do not lessen the need to be wise, well read, experienced, and compassionate towards the patient, in spite of the help given by computers and other technology. Australian doctors, medical teachers and writers continue to look to Osler’s guidance in applying his principles to modern medical practice.


Author


Competing interests


Acknowledgements


References