Organ donation after cardiac death: legal and ethical justifications for antemortem interventions

James Tibballs
Med J Aust 2008; 188 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01572.x
Published online: 4 February 2008

To the Editor: Richards and Rogers1 claim that antemortem interventions on an organ donor to improve organ viability for donation after cardiac death (DCD), such as administration of heparin and femoral vessel cannulation, are ethically and legally justified. Their reasoning is flawed.

  • James Tibballs

  • Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.