Connect
MJA
MJA

Lung transplantation: does age make a difference?

Gregory I Snell, Glen P Westall and Trevor J Williams
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01237.x
Published online: 3 September 2007

Significant similarities between the challenges of lung transplantation in patients of all ages should lead to better access to this life-saving surgery for children and adolescents

Lung transplantation (LTx) is firmly established as a therapy for end-stage lung and pulmonary vascular diseases in patients aged over 18 years and into the seventh decade of life.1,2 However, for those under the age of 18, be they child or adolescent, the role of LTx is less clear.3,4 In Australia, this has contributed to a perception that the risk of undertaking LTx in children and adolescents does not warrant the reward. Indeed, presently in this country, there is no major paediatric hospital offering a lung transplant program, likely recognising the complexity of treating such patients coupled with the potential risk of achieving poor results with a low case load — the reality is that the projected case numbers will only be of the order of four to eight per year across Australia and New Zealand.


  • Lung Transplant Service, Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.


Correspondence: g.snell@alfred.org.au

  • 1. Trulock EP, Edwards LB, Taylor DO, et al; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-third official adult lung and heart–lung transplantation report — 2006. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25: 880-892.
  • 2. Smith PW, Wang H, Parini V, et al. Lung transplantation in patients over 60 years and older: results, complications and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 1835-1841.
  • 3. Frader JE. Deconstructing donation after cardiac death. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007; 8: 76-77.
  • 4. Sweet SC, Faro A. Not so fast — don’t deprive children with cystic fibrosis of the option of lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 246-247.
  • 5. Morton JM, Malouf MA, Plit ML, et al. Successful lung transplantation for adolescents at a hospital for adults. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 278-282. <MJA full text>
  • 6. Westall G, Burton J, Robertson C, et al. The child with advanced lung disease: addressing an unmet need. Respirology 2007; 12: A67.
  • 7. Waltz DA, Boucek MM, Edwards LB, et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: ninth official pediatric lung and heart–lung transplantation report — 2006. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25: 904-911.
  • 8. Wells A, Faro A. Special considerations in pediatric lung transplantation. Semin Resp Crit Care Med 2006; 27: 552-560.
  • 9. Taylor L, Tsang A, Drabbie A. Transition of transplant patients with cystic fibrosis to adult care: today’s challenges. Prog Transplant 2006; 16: 329-334.
  • 10. Elizur A, Sweet SC, Huddleston CB, et al. Pre-transplant mechanical ventilation increases short-term morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 127-131.
  • 11. Lingaraju R, Mendez J, Kotloff RM, et al. The lung allocation score and its components predict transplant survival well for groups, but not individual patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: S189-S190.
  • 12. Williams TJ, Snell GI. Organ procurement strategies to optimise donor availability. Semin Resp Crit Care Med 2001; 22: 541-550.
  • 13. Date H, Tanimoto Y, Goto K, et al. A new treatment strategy for advanced idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: living-donor lobar lung transplantation. Chest 2005; 128: 1364-1370.
  • 14. Oto T, Levvey B, McEgan R, et al. A practical approach to clinical lung transplantation from a Maastricht Category III donor with cardiac death. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 196-199.
  • 15. Kolovos NS, Webster P, Bratton SL. Donation after cardiac death in pediatric critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007; 8: 47-49.
  • 16. Egan TM, Murray S, Bustami RT. Development of the new lung allocation score in the United States. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1212-1227.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.